- Created 15 real-world test scenarios across diverse industries - Each scenario includes autonomous instructions and results placeholders - Industries covered: engineering, healthcare, finance, education, tech, agriculture - Scenarios test FSS-Mini-RAG with authentic professional use cases - Complete deployment guide and validation tools included - Ready for agent delegation and execution Scenarios range from mechanical engineering CAD standards to cybersecurity compliance, ensuring broad market validation.
167 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
167 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
# FSS-Mini-RAG Agent User Testing Scenarios
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 **Testing Overview**
|
|
|
|
This directory contains 15 comprehensive real-world testing scenarios designed for autonomous agent execution. Each scenario simulates a professional user from a different industry using FSS-Mini-RAG to solve authentic research challenges.
|
|
|
|
## 📋 **Test Scenario Categories**
|
|
|
|
### **Engineering & Manufacturing** 🔧
|
|
- **01-mechanical-engineering**: CAD standards and automotive component design research
|
|
- **03-plant-logistics**: Warehouse optimization and supply chain management
|
|
- **09-construction-safety**: OSHA compliance and workplace safety protocols
|
|
|
|
### **Healthcare & Life Sciences** 🏥
|
|
- **05-medical-research**: Clinical trial protocol development and FDA regulations
|
|
- **15-environmental-consulting**: Impact assessment and soil remediation planning
|
|
|
|
### **Financial & Legal Services** 💼
|
|
- **04-financial-compliance**: SEC regulations and investment advisory compliance
|
|
- **06-real-estate-development**: Zoning regulations and environmental requirements
|
|
|
|
### **Education & Social Services** 🎓
|
|
- **02-childcare-regulations**: Licensing requirements and safety compliance
|
|
- **08-education-technology**: Digital learning platform implementation
|
|
- **10-nonprofit-fundraising**: Grant writing and fundraising strategies
|
|
|
|
### **Technology & Digital Services** 💻
|
|
- **11-cybersecurity-compliance**: Security frameworks and risk assessment
|
|
- **12-retail-ecommerce**: Digital marketing and customer experience optimization
|
|
- **14-software-development**: API design and microservices architecture
|
|
|
|
### **Hospitality & Agriculture** 🌱
|
|
- **07-agriculture-sustainability**: Organic farming and sustainable practices
|
|
- **13-hospitality-operations**: Hotel management and guest experience
|
|
|
|
## 🏗️ **Scenario Structure**
|
|
|
|
Each scenario follows a standardized structure:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
XX-scenario-name/
|
|
├── INSTRUCTIONS.md # Complete autonomous task instructions
|
|
└── RESULTS.md # Placeholder for agent findings
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### **Standard Workflow**
|
|
1. **Setup**: Agent installs FSS-Mini-RAG following README instructions
|
|
2. **Research**: Agent gathers industry-specific documentation (3-5 sources)
|
|
3. **Index**: Agent creates RAG index of research materials
|
|
4. **Query**: Agent performs 5 targeted searches for domain-specific questions
|
|
5. **Analyze**: Agent documents findings and evaluates FSS-Mini-RAG effectiveness
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 **Agent Deployment Guide**
|
|
|
|
### **Prerequisites**
|
|
- Agent must read the main repository README.md first
|
|
- Agent should have access to internet for research material gathering
|
|
- Agent needs ability to create directories and download files
|
|
|
|
### **Deployment Command Structure**
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Example agent delegation command
|
|
agent-launch [AGENT_TYPE] "agent-user-testing/XX-scenario-name/INSTRUCTIONS.md" "/MASTERFOLDER/Coding/Fss-Mini-Rag" "agent-user-testing/XX-scenario-name/RESULTS.md"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### **Recommended Agent Types by Scenario**
|
|
|
|
| Scenario | Recommended Agent Type | Rationale |
|
|
|----------|----------------------|-----------|
|
|
| 01-mechanical-engineering | michael-technical-implementation | Technical analysis expertise |
|
|
| 02-childcare-regulations | quality-assurance | Regulatory compliance focus |
|
|
| 03-plant-logistics | michael-technical-implementation | Operations optimization |
|
|
| 04-financial-compliance | emma-auth-specialist | Security and compliance expertise |
|
|
| 05-medical-research | quality-assurance | Regulatory requirements focus |
|
|
| 06-real-estate-development | project-structure-specialist | Documentation organization |
|
|
| 07-agriculture-sustainability | quality-assurance | Best practices analysis |
|
|
| 08-education-technology | michael-technical-implementation | EdTech implementation |
|
|
| 09-construction-safety | quality-assurance | Safety compliance expertise |
|
|
| 10-nonprofit-fundraising | project-structure-specialist | Document organization |
|
|
| 11-cybersecurity-compliance | emma-auth-specialist | Security frameworks |
|
|
| 12-retail-ecommerce | michael-technical-implementation | Technical marketing analysis |
|
|
| 13-hospitality-operations | quality-assurance | Operations best practices |
|
|
| 14-software-development | michael-technical-implementation | Technical architecture |
|
|
| 15-environmental-consulting | quality-assurance | Environmental compliance |
|
|
|
|
## 📊 **Testing Objectives**
|
|
|
|
### **Primary Goals**
|
|
1. **Usability Testing**: Validate installation and setup process across different user types
|
|
2. **Domain Effectiveness**: Test FSS-Mini-RAG performance with industry-specific content
|
|
3. **Search Quality**: Evaluate semantic search accuracy for professional queries
|
|
4. **Documentation Quality**: Assess README clarity and instruction completeness
|
|
|
|
### **Success Criteria**
|
|
- **Installation Success**: Agent successfully installs FSS-Mini-RAG on first attempt
|
|
- **Research Completion**: Agent gathers appropriate domain materials (3-5 sources)
|
|
- **Indexing Success**: Agent successfully creates RAG index without errors
|
|
- **Query Effectiveness**: Agent finds relevant answers to domain-specific questions
|
|
- **Professional Relevance**: Agent evaluation confirms real-world applicability
|
|
|
|
### **Evaluation Metrics**
|
|
- Installation time and success rate
|
|
- Research material quality and relevance
|
|
- Search result accuracy and usefulness
|
|
- Overall user experience rating
|
|
- Industry-specific value assessment
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 **Real-World Applicability**
|
|
|
|
Each scenario represents authentic professional challenges:
|
|
|
|
### **High-Stakes Industries** 🚨
|
|
- **Healthcare**: Clinical trials with FDA compliance requirements
|
|
- **Financial Services**: SEC regulatory compliance with penalty avoidance
|
|
- **Construction**: OSHA safety compliance with liability implications
|
|
|
|
### **Operational Excellence** 📈
|
|
- **Manufacturing**: Supply chain optimization for cost reduction
|
|
- **Agriculture**: Sustainable practices for long-term viability
|
|
- **Hospitality**: Guest experience optimization for revenue growth
|
|
|
|
### **Technology Integration** 💡
|
|
- **Education**: EdTech implementation for improved learning outcomes
|
|
- **Cybersecurity**: Framework implementation for risk mitigation
|
|
- **Software Development**: API design for scalable architecture
|
|
|
|
## 🚀 **Execution Timeline**
|
|
|
|
### **Sequential Testing** (Recommended)
|
|
- **Week 1**: Engineering & Manufacturing (scenarios 01, 03, 09)
|
|
- **Week 2**: Healthcare & Life Sciences (scenarios 05, 15)
|
|
- **Week 3**: Financial & Legal Services (scenarios 04, 06)
|
|
- **Week 4**: Education & Social Services (scenarios 02, 08, 10)
|
|
- **Week 5**: Technology & Digital Services (scenarios 11, 12, 14)
|
|
- **Week 6**: Hospitality & Agriculture (scenarios 07, 13)
|
|
|
|
### **Parallel Testing** (Accelerated)
|
|
- Deploy 3-5 agents simultaneously with different scenarios
|
|
- Focus on diverse industry representation
|
|
- Prioritize high-impact scenarios first
|
|
|
|
## 📈 **Expected Outcomes**
|
|
|
|
### **Validation Results**
|
|
- **Installation Process**: Identify pain points and improvement opportunities
|
|
- **Industry Fit**: Confirm FSS-Mini-RAG value across professional domains
|
|
- **Feature Gaps**: Discover missing functionality for specific use cases
|
|
- **Documentation Improvements**: Enhance user guidance and examples
|
|
|
|
### **Product Insights**
|
|
- **Search Accuracy**: Performance with domain-specific terminology
|
|
- **Content Type Effectiveness**: PDF, documentation, regulations handling
|
|
- **User Experience**: Professional workflow integration potential
|
|
- **Scalability Assessment**: Multi-document, large corpus performance
|
|
|
|
## 🎉 **Success Impact**
|
|
|
|
These testing scenarios will:
|
|
- **Validate Market Fit**: Confirm FSS-Mini-RAG value across industries
|
|
- **Improve User Experience**: Identify and resolve usability issues
|
|
- **Enhance Documentation**: Create industry-specific usage examples
|
|
- **Guide Feature Development**: Prioritize improvements based on real needs
|
|
- **Build Confidence**: Demonstrate professional-grade reliability
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Ready to deploy? Each scenario is completely autonomous and designed for independent agent execution. Choose your starting scenarios and delegate with confidence!** 🚀 |