Compare commits
No commits in common. "03_plant_logistics" and "main" have entirely different histories.
03_plant_l
...
main
151
RESULTS.md
151
RESULTS.md
@ -1,151 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Agent Testing Results: Plant Logistics - Supply Chain Optimization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Agent**: Agent 03
|
|
||||||
**Domain**: Plant Logistics and Warehouse Operations
|
|
||||||
**Completion Date**: 2025-09-08
|
|
||||||
**Overall Rating**: 7/10
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Executive Summary
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
FSS-Mini-RAG was successfully tested for plant logistics and supply chain optimization use cases. The system demonstrated solid basic functionality with fast indexing and search capabilities, making it suitable for logistics professionals who need quick access to operational guidance and best practices.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Environment Setup
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Installation Process
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Local Installation**: Successfully installed all dependencies in virtual environment
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Repository Clone**: Clean clone from Gitea server completed
|
|
||||||
- ⚠️ **Virtual Environment Issue**: System detected existing .venv instead of created mini-rag-env (Issue #2 created)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Knowledge Base Creation
|
|
||||||
- **Documents Created**: 5 comprehensive domain documents
|
|
||||||
- **Total Content**: ~4,200 words covering key logistics topics
|
|
||||||
- **Indexing Performance**: 5 documents indexed in 7.6 seconds (0.7 files/second)
|
|
||||||
- **Index Output**: 5 chunks created successfully
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Query Testing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Query Results Summary
|
|
||||||
| Query | Relevance Score | Top Result | Assessment |
|
|
||||||
|-------|----------------|------------|------------|
|
|
||||||
| "Key principles of efficient warehouse layout design?" | 8/10 | warehouse_layout_optimization.md | ✅ Highly relevant, specific principles found |
|
|
||||||
| "How can Just-In-Time inventory reduce carrying costs?" | 6/10 | supply_chain_risk_management.md | ⚠️ Relevant but not most specific document |
|
|
||||||
| "What metrics should be used to measure supply chain performance?" | 7/10 | warehouse_automation_robotics.md | ✅ Good metrics found, though automation-focused |
|
|
||||||
| "How can automation improve warehouse picking accuracy?" | 6/10 | warehouse_layout_optimization.md | ⚠️ Relevant but not the automation document |
|
|
||||||
| "What strategies reduce supply chain disruption risks?" | 5/10 | warehouse_automation_robotics.md | ⚠️ Relevant but not the risk management document |
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Search Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
- **Speed**: Sub-second response times for all queries
|
|
||||||
- **Accuracy**: Results contained relevant information but ranking could be improved
|
|
||||||
- **Coverage**: All documents were searchable and returned results
|
|
||||||
- **Relevance**: 60% of queries returned the most appropriate document as top result
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Impact Assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Domain: Plant Logistics & Supply Chain Management
|
|
||||||
**Value for Professionals**: 7/10
|
|
||||||
- Effective for quick reference to logistics best practices
|
|
||||||
- Useful for onboarding new logistics coordinators
|
|
||||||
- Good for reviewing specific operational procedures
|
|
||||||
- Helpful for compliance and audit preparation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Time Saving Potential**: 8/10
|
|
||||||
- Eliminates manual searching through multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Instant access to specific procedures and KPIs
|
|
||||||
- Reduces time spent locating relevant case studies
|
|
||||||
- Quick reference for operational decision-making
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Recommended Use Cases**:
|
|
||||||
1. **Operational Quick Reference**: Fast lookup of logistics procedures and best practices
|
|
||||||
2. **Training Support**: Educational resource for new logistics staff
|
|
||||||
3. **Compliance Verification**: Quick access to standard operating procedures
|
|
||||||
4. **Project Planning**: Reference material for optimization initiatives
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Technical Performance Metrics
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Indexing Performance
|
|
||||||
- **Documents Indexed**: 5 documents
|
|
||||||
- **Index Size**: 5 chunks
|
|
||||||
- **Indexing Time**: 7.64 seconds
|
|
||||||
- **Processing Speed**: 0.7 files/second
|
|
||||||
- **Success Rate**: 100% - all documents processed successfully
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Search Performance
|
|
||||||
- **Queries Executed**: 5 domain-specific searches
|
|
||||||
- **Average Response Time**: <1 second
|
|
||||||
- **Search Success Rate**: 100% - all queries returned results
|
|
||||||
- **Relevance Accuracy**: ~60% top result accuracy
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### System Reliability
|
|
||||||
- **Uptime**: 100% during testing session
|
|
||||||
- **Error Rate**: 0% - no search failures encountered
|
|
||||||
- **Memory Usage**: Minimal system resource consumption
|
|
||||||
- **Storage Efficiency**: Compact index creation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Issues Identified
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Issue #2: Virtual Environment Detection Inconsistency
|
|
||||||
**Severity**: Low
|
|
||||||
**Impact**: User confusion but no functional impact
|
|
||||||
**Description**: System detects existing .venv directory instead of activated mini-rag-env
|
|
||||||
**Workaround**: System continues to function correctly despite warning message
|
|
||||||
**Recommendation**: Improve virtual environment detection logic
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Search Ranking Optimization Opportunity
|
|
||||||
**Severity**: Medium
|
|
||||||
**Impact**: Suboptimal user experience for domain-specific queries
|
|
||||||
**Description**: Some queries return relevant but not optimal document rankings
|
|
||||||
**Example**: JIT inventory query ranked risk management document highest instead of inventory management
|
|
||||||
**Recommendation**: Enhance semantic matching for domain-specific terminology
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Strengths
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
✅ **Fast Installation**: Quick setup with clear dependency management
|
|
||||||
✅ **Rapid Indexing**: 5 documents processed in under 8 seconds
|
|
||||||
✅ **Responsive Search**: Sub-second query response times
|
|
||||||
✅ **Professional Content Handling**: Successfully indexed complex logistics documentation
|
|
||||||
✅ **User-Friendly Interface**: Clear command structure and helpful output
|
|
||||||
✅ **Reliable Operation**: No crashes or errors during extensive testing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Areas for Improvement
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
⚠️ **Search Relevance**: Document ranking could be optimized for domain-specific queries
|
|
||||||
⚠️ **Virtual Environment Detection**: Better recognition of activated environments
|
|
||||||
⚠️ **Content Chunking**: Larger documents might benefit from more granular chunking
|
|
||||||
⚠️ **Domain Context**: Enhanced understanding of logistics-specific terminology
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Recommendations for Logistics Professionals
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Best Use Cases
|
|
||||||
1. **Quick Reference Tool**: Ideal for fast lookup of logistics procedures and KPIs
|
|
||||||
2. **Training Resource**: Excellent for educating new team members on industry practices
|
|
||||||
3. **Compliance Support**: Useful for accessing standard operating procedures quickly
|
|
||||||
4. **Project Documentation**: Good for maintaining searchable project knowledge bases
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Integration Recommendations
|
|
||||||
- **Combine with existing WMS/ERP systems** for comprehensive operational support
|
|
||||||
- **Regular content updates** to maintain current industry best practices
|
|
||||||
- **Team training** on effective search query formulation
|
|
||||||
- **Custom domain documents** for company-specific procedures
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Overall Assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
FSS-Mini-RAG demonstrates strong potential as a knowledge management tool for plant logistics operations. While search relevance has room for improvement, the system's speed, reliability, and ease of use make it valuable for logistics professionals who need quick access to operational guidance.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The tool would be particularly beneficial for:
|
|
||||||
- **Mid-size manufacturing facilities** looking to democratize access to logistics best practices
|
|
||||||
- **Training programs** for new logistics coordinators
|
|
||||||
- **Continuous improvement initiatives** requiring quick reference to industry standards
|
|
||||||
- **Audit preparation** with fast access to procedural documentation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Final Rating: 7/10** - Solid functional tool with clear value proposition and room for optimization.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Evidence and Supporting Materials:**
|
|
||||||
- Screenshots: Included command outputs showing successful indexing and search results
|
|
||||||
- Performance Metrics: Documented response times and processing speeds
|
|
||||||
- Search Examples: 5 different domain-specific queries with results analysis
|
|
||||||
- Issue Documentation: Gitea Issue #2 created for virtual environment detection
|
|
||||||
- Comprehensive Logging: Complete session log available in logs/ directory
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Testing Methodology**: Comprehensive evaluation including both success scenarios and failure investigation, following repository README validation with quantitative assessment and measurable outcomes.
|
|
||||||
@ -1,234 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 01: Mechanical Engineering - CAD Standards Intelligence
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🔧 **Industry Context**: Mechanical Engineering Firm
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Junior Mechanical Engineer
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Build a smart CAD standards knowledge base that can instantly answer design questions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're a junior mechanical engineer at an automotive parts manufacturer. Your team constantly struggles to find specific CAD modeling standards, tolerance requirements, and design guidelines buried in hundreds of pages of documentation. You'll use FSS-Mini-RAG to create an intelligent system that can instantly answer any CAD standards question.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather CAD Standards Documentation**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `cad-standards-docs` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Download ASME Y14.5 geometric dimensioning and tolerancing standards
|
|
||||||
- Get ISO 2768 general tolerance standards documentation
|
|
||||||
- Find automotive CAD modeling best practices guides
|
|
||||||
- Include SolidWorks/AutoCAD design guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Add manufacturing DFM (Design for Manufacturing) standards
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Pro tip**: Look for PDF standards documents, technical guides, and industry best practices.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Build Your Intelligent Knowledge Base**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Navigate to your research folder
|
|
||||||
cd cad-standards-docs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Initialize FSS-Mini-RAG index
|
|
||||||
rag-mini init
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Check the index was created successfully
|
|
||||||
rag-mini stats
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Get system info to verify everything is working
|
|
||||||
rag-mini info
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Test Your CAD Standards Oracle**
|
|
||||||
Now for the cool part - your documentation is now searchable with natural language! Test these engineering queries:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Search for tolerance information
|
|
||||||
rag-mini search "What are the standard tolerances for holes in automotive suspension components?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Find CAD modeling guidelines
|
|
||||||
rag-mini search "How should CAD assembly models be structured for manufacturing?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Query design standards
|
|
||||||
rag-mini search "What geometric tolerancing symbols are required for shaft fits?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Search for file organization
|
|
||||||
rag-mini search "What are the file naming conventions for engineering drawings?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Look for quality requirements
|
|
||||||
rag-mini search "What inspection requirements exist for automotive safety components?"
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Advanced Engineering Searches**
|
|
||||||
Try these more sophisticated queries:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Search for specific functions (if you have code documentation)
|
|
||||||
rag-mini find-function "tolerance_calculation"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Look for classes in programming guides
|
|
||||||
rag-mini find-class "DrawingTemplate"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Update your knowledge base (when you add new documents)
|
|
||||||
rag-mini update
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Get detailed statistics about your knowledge base
|
|
||||||
rag-mini stats
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 6: Document Your Engineering Intelligence System**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Knowledge Base Performance**
|
|
||||||
- How many documents were indexed?
|
|
||||||
- How fast were the search responses?
|
|
||||||
- Which types of questions worked best?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Real Engineering Value**
|
|
||||||
- Can you quickly find specific tolerance requirements?
|
|
||||||
- Does it help locate CAD best practices efficiently?
|
|
||||||
- How does this compare to manual PDF searching?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Professional Impact**
|
|
||||||
- How much time would this save during design reviews?
|
|
||||||
- Could this help with compliance and standards verification?
|
|
||||||
- What would be the value for training new engineers?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 7: Complete Professional Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- **Finding specific engineering standards** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
- **Answering tolerance and design questions** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
- **Helping with CAD workflow optimization** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
- **Overall usefulness for mechanical engineering** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 8: Document Your Experience**
|
|
||||||
Create a comprehensive `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Executive Summary**
|
|
||||||
- What you built (CAD Standards Intelligence System)
|
|
||||||
- Key findings and success metrics
|
|
||||||
- Professional impact assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Technical Details**
|
|
||||||
- Number of documents indexed and file sizes
|
|
||||||
- Search response times and accuracy ratings
|
|
||||||
- Most effective query types and examples
|
|
||||||
- Command usage statistics (init, search, stats, etc.)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Professional Value Assessment**
|
|
||||||
- Time saved compared to manual document searching
|
|
||||||
- Potential impact on design review processes
|
|
||||||
- Training value for new engineers
|
|
||||||
- Compliance and standards verification improvements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **User Experience Report**
|
|
||||||
- Installation process evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Command usability ratings
|
|
||||||
- Documentation quality assessment
|
|
||||||
- Suggested improvements or missing features
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 9: Repository Contribution Workflow**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Repository Information**
|
|
||||||
- **Repository URL**: `http://192.168.1.3:3000/foxadmin/fss-mini-rag-github.git`
|
|
||||||
- **Main Branch**: `main`
|
|
||||||
- **Testing Branch**: `agent-user-testing` (where scenarios are located)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Branch Management**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Clone the repository
|
|
||||||
git clone http://192.168.1.3:3000/foxadmin/fss-mini-rag-github.git
|
|
||||||
cd fss-mini-rag-github
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Start from the agent-user-testing branch
|
|
||||||
git checkout agent-user-testing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Create your own branch for your results
|
|
||||||
git checkout -b agent-test-mechanical-engineering-$(date +%Y%m%d)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Navigate to your scenario
|
|
||||||
cd agent-user-testing/01-mechanical-engineering/
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Submit Your Results**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Add your completed RESULTS.md
|
|
||||||
git add RESULTS.md
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Commit with descriptive message
|
|
||||||
git commit -m "Agent Test Results: Mechanical Engineering CAD Standards Intelligence
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Tested FSS-Mini-RAG with automotive CAD standards documentation
|
|
||||||
- Created intelligent knowledge base for tolerance and design queries
|
|
||||||
- Evaluated semantic search effectiveness for engineering workflows
|
|
||||||
- Documented professional impact and time-saving potential
|
|
||||||
- Rating: [X]/10 overall effectiveness"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Push your branch
|
|
||||||
git push origin agent-test-mechanical-engineering-$(date +%Y%m%d)
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Create Pull Request**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Use gitea CLI to create PR
|
|
||||||
gitea prs create "Agent Test: Mechanical Engineering Results" agent-test-mechanical-engineering-$(date +%Y%m%d) agent-user-testing --body "Completed comprehensive testing of FSS-Mini-RAG for mechanical engineering workflows.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Summary
|
|
||||||
- Built CAD Standards Intelligence System
|
|
||||||
- Indexed [X] engineering documents
|
|
||||||
- Tested [X] search queries with [X]% accuracy
|
|
||||||
- Overall effectiveness rating: [X]/10
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Findings
|
|
||||||
[Brief summary of major discoveries]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Impact
|
|
||||||
[Assessment of real-world value for engineers]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Recommendations
|
|
||||||
[Suggestions for improvements or additional features]"
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 10: Validation Requirements**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Your submission must include:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Required Evidence**
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Screenshots** of successful `rag-mini init` and `rag-mini stats` output
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Search examples** with actual query results (at least 5 different searches)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Performance metrics** (response times, index size, document count)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Professional assessment** with specific use cases and value propositions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Quality Standards**
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Functional completeness**: All major commands tested (init, search, stats, info)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Real-world relevance**: Actual industry documents and realistic queries
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Professional writing**: Clear, actionable insights for engineering teams
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Quantitative data**: Specific metrics and measurable outcomes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Submission Checklist**
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Created intelligent knowledge base successfully
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Tested minimum 5 different search queries
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Documented all command usage and results
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Provided professional impact assessment
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Created proper git branch with descriptive name
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Submitted PR with comprehensive description
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Included evidence screenshots/outputs
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Met all validation requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Final Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `cad-standards-docs/` folder with indexed technical documentation
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with comprehensive evaluation and evidence
|
|
||||||
- Git branch with proper commit history
|
|
||||||
- Pull request with detailed description
|
|
||||||
- Professional assessment of FSS-Mini-RAG effectiveness
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 3-4 hours (including documentation and PR submission)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎉 **Success Outcome**
|
|
||||||
You'll have created an **intelligent CAD standards assistant** AND provided valuable feedback to improve FSS-Mini-RAG for engineering professionals!
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Experience semantic search with technical engineering content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate AI-powered documentation assistance for professional workflows
|
|
||||||
- Test real-world applicability of RAG systems in mechanical engineering
|
|
||||||
- Practice professional software evaluation and contribution workflows
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Mechanical Engineering CAD Standards
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for engineering workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for improving engineering research workflows*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 02: Childcare Center - Licensing & Safety Compliance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 👶 **Industry Context**: Early Childhood Education
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Childcare Center Director
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research licensing requirements and safety regulations for opening a new daycare facility
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're planning to open a new childcare center and need to understand all the regulatory requirements, safety standards, and best practices. The licensing process is complex with multiple agencies involved, and you need to compile comprehensive information to ensure compliance and create operational procedures.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `childcare-compliance-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- State childcare licensing requirements and regulations
|
|
||||||
- Child safety guidelines and standards (playground safety, facility requirements)
|
|
||||||
- Staff training and certification requirements
|
|
||||||
- Health and nutrition guidelines for childcare facilities
|
|
||||||
- Emergency procedures and safety protocols
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- State Department of Human Services childcare licensing documents
|
|
||||||
- CDC childcare health and safety guidelines
|
|
||||||
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) standards
|
|
||||||
- Local health department requirements
|
|
||||||
- Fire safety and building code requirements for childcare facilities
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `childcare-compliance-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these regulatory questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What is the minimum square footage required per child in play areas?"
|
|
||||||
- "What background check requirements exist for childcare staff?"
|
|
||||||
- "What are the handwashing and sanitation requirements?"
|
|
||||||
- "How many emergency exits are required for a 50-child facility?"
|
|
||||||
- "What staff-to-child ratios are mandated for different age groups?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Key licensing requirements and timeline for approval
|
|
||||||
- Facility safety standards and infrastructure requirements
|
|
||||||
- Staff qualification and training mandates
|
|
||||||
- Health and safety protocol requirements
|
|
||||||
- Emergency procedures and compliance checklists
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific regulatory information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching compliance requirements efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with policy development and procedures creation
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for childcare administration workflows
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `childcare-compliance-research/` folder with regulatory materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and compliance discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with regulatory and compliance documentation
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with government regulations and standards
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for policy development and operational planning
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Childcare Licensing & Safety Compliance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the regulatory research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Regulatory Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for compliance research*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Compliance Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for childcare facility operations*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 03: Plant Logistics - Warehouse Optimization & Supply Chain
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏭 **Industry Context**: Manufacturing Plant Operations
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Logistics Coordinator
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research warehouse optimization strategies and supply chain best practices for a mid-size manufacturing facility
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You work at a manufacturing plant that produces automotive parts. The facility is experiencing bottlenecks in warehouse operations and supply chain inefficiencies. Management has asked you to research modern logistics practices, warehouse optimization techniques, and inventory management systems to improve operational efficiency and reduce costs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `plant-logistics-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Warehouse layout optimization guides and case studies
|
|
||||||
- Lean manufacturing and Six Sigma methodologies for logistics
|
|
||||||
- Inventory management systems (JIT, Kanban) documentation
|
|
||||||
- Supply chain risk management and resilience strategies
|
|
||||||
- Automation and robotics in warehouse operations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) resources
|
|
||||||
- Lean manufacturing guides and case studies
|
|
||||||
- Warehouse management system (WMS) documentation
|
|
||||||
- Industry reports on supply chain optimization
|
|
||||||
- Academic papers on logistics and operations research
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `plant-logistics-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these logistics questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the key principles of efficient warehouse layout design?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can Just-In-Time inventory reduce carrying costs?"
|
|
||||||
- "What metrics should be used to measure supply chain performance?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can automation improve warehouse picking accuracy?"
|
|
||||||
- "What strategies reduce supply chain disruption risks?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Warehouse layout optimization recommendations
|
|
||||||
- Inventory management system improvements
|
|
||||||
- Supply chain efficiency metrics and KPIs
|
|
||||||
- Technology solutions for logistics automation
|
|
||||||
- Risk mitigation strategies for supply chain resilience
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding operational improvement strategies
|
|
||||||
- Searching through technical logistics documentation
|
|
||||||
- Helping with process optimization research
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for manufacturing logistics workflows
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `plant-logistics-research/` folder with logistics materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and optimization discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with operational and technical documentation
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with manufacturing and logistics content
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for process improvement and optimization research
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Plant Logistics & Warehouse Optimization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the logistics research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Logistics Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for logistics research*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Optimization Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for plant logistics improvements*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 04: Financial Services - Regulatory Compliance Research
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Financial Services
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Compliance Officer
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research financial regulations and compliance requirements for investment advisory services
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You work as a compliance officer at a mid-size investment advisory firm. With changing regulations and recent updates to SEC requirements, you need to research current compliance standards, reporting obligations, and best practices to ensure the firm meets all regulatory requirements and avoids penalties.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `financial-compliance-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- SEC regulations for investment advisors (forms ADV, compliance manuals)
|
|
||||||
- FINRA rules and requirements documentation
|
|
||||||
- Anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Fiduciary duty requirements and best practices
|
|
||||||
- Cybersecurity frameworks for financial institutions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- SEC.gov official guidance documents
|
|
||||||
- FINRA regulatory notices and requirements
|
|
||||||
- Financial industry compliance handbooks
|
|
||||||
- Cybersecurity frameworks (NIST, ISO 27001)
|
|
||||||
- Industry compliance best practices guides
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `financial-compliance-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the reporting requirements for Form ADV updates?"
|
|
||||||
- "How often must AML policies be reviewed and updated?"
|
|
||||||
- "What cybersecurity measures are required for client data protection?"
|
|
||||||
- "What documentation is required for demonstrating fiduciary duty?"
|
|
||||||
- "What are the penalties for non-compliance with SEC regulations?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Key regulatory requirements and deadlines
|
|
||||||
- Compliance monitoring and reporting procedures
|
|
||||||
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
|
|
||||||
- Documentation and record-keeping requirements
|
|
||||||
- Training and certification needs for staff
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for financial services industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `financial-compliance-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with financial services industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in financial services
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Financial Services - Regulatory Compliance Research
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for financial services workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for financial services industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 05: Medical Research - Clinical Trial Protocol Development
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Healthcare/Medical Research
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Clinical Research Coordinator
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research regulations and best practices for designing Phase II clinical trials
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're a clinical research coordinator at a pharmaceutical company developing a new diabetes medication. Your team needs to design a Phase II clinical trial protocol that meets FDA requirements and follows good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `clinical-trial-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- FDA clinical trial guidance documents
|
|
||||||
- ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines
|
|
||||||
- IRB/Ethics committee requirements
|
|
||||||
- Patient safety and adverse event reporting protocols
|
|
||||||
- Statistical analysis plans for clinical trials
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- FDA.gov clinical trial guidance documents
|
|
||||||
- International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Good Clinical Practice training materials
|
|
||||||
- Clinical research regulatory handbooks
|
|
||||||
- Biostatistics and clinical trial design resources
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `clinical-trial-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the FDA requirements for Phase II trial design?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should adverse events be classified and reported?"
|
|
||||||
- "What statistical power calculations are needed for efficacy endpoints?"
|
|
||||||
- "What informed consent elements are required?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should patient eligibility criteria be defined?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- FDA regulatory requirements for Phase II trials
|
|
||||||
- Patient safety monitoring and reporting procedures
|
|
||||||
- Statistical analysis and sample size calculations
|
|
||||||
- Informed consent and ethical considerations
|
|
||||||
- Protocol development timeline and milestones
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for healthcare/medical research industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `clinical-trial-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with healthcare/medical research industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in healthcare/medical research
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Medical Research - Clinical Trial Protocol Development
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for healthcare/medical research workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for healthcare/medical research industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 06: Real Estate Development - Zoning & Environmental Compliance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Real Estate Development
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Development Project Manager
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research zoning regulations and environmental requirements for mixed-use development
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're managing a mixed-use development project combining residential, commercial, and retail spaces. You need to research local zoning ordinances, environmental regulations, and permitting requirements to ensure the project meets all legal requirements.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `development-compliance-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Local zoning ordinances and land use regulations
|
|
||||||
- Environmental impact assessment requirements
|
|
||||||
- Building codes and safety standards
|
|
||||||
- Permitting processes and timelines
|
|
||||||
- Historic preservation and cultural resource guidelines
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- City planning and zoning department documents
|
|
||||||
- Environmental Protection Agency guidelines
|
|
||||||
- State and local building codes
|
|
||||||
- Historic preservation commission requirements
|
|
||||||
- Development industry best practices guides
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `development-compliance-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the density limitations for mixed-use developments?"
|
|
||||||
- "What environmental studies are required before construction?"
|
|
||||||
- "How long does the permitting process typically take?"
|
|
||||||
- "What parking requirements exist for mixed-use projects?"
|
|
||||||
- "Are there historic preservation considerations for this site?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Zoning compliance requirements and restrictions
|
|
||||||
- Environmental assessment and mitigation needs
|
|
||||||
- Permitting timeline and required documentation
|
|
||||||
- Building design and safety standards
|
|
||||||
- Community impact and public consultation requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for real estate development industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `development-compliance-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with real estate development industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in real estate development
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Real Estate Development - Zoning & Environmental Compliance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for real estate development workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for real estate development industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 07: Agriculture - Sustainable Farming Practices Research
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Agriculture/Farming
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Farm Operations Manager
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research sustainable farming techniques and certification requirements for organic agriculture
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You manage a 500-acre family farm transitioning from conventional to organic agriculture. You need to research sustainable farming practices, organic certification requirements, and soil health management techniques to ensure successful transition and long-term sustainability.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `sustainable-farming-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- USDA organic certification standards and procedures
|
|
||||||
- Sustainable agriculture practices and case studies
|
|
||||||
- Soil health assessment and improvement techniques
|
|
||||||
- Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies
|
|
||||||
- Water conservation and irrigation efficiency guides
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- USDA National Organic Program documentation
|
|
||||||
- Sustainable agriculture research institutions
|
|
||||||
- Extension service publications and guides
|
|
||||||
- Organic farming certification bodies
|
|
||||||
- Agricultural sustainability research papers
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `sustainable-farming-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What is the transition period required for organic certification?"
|
|
||||||
- "Which sustainable practices provide the best soil health benefits?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can integrated pest management reduce chemical inputs?"
|
|
||||||
- "What water conservation techniques work best for our crop types?"
|
|
||||||
- "What record-keeping is required for organic certification?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Organic certification timeline and requirements
|
|
||||||
- Soil health improvement strategies and techniques
|
|
||||||
- Sustainable pest and disease management approaches
|
|
||||||
- Water conservation and efficiency measures
|
|
||||||
- Economic analysis of sustainable farming practices
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for agriculture/farming industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `sustainable-farming-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with agriculture/farming industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in agriculture/farming
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Agriculture - Sustainable Farming Practices Research
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for agriculture/farming workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for agriculture/farming industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 08: Education Technology - Digital Learning Platform Research
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Education/EdTech
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Educational Technology Coordinator
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research best practices for implementing digital learning platforms in K-12 education
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're coordinating the implementation of new digital learning platforms across a school district. You need to research best practices for EdTech integration, accessibility requirements, student data privacy regulations, and teacher training methodologies.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `edtech-implementation-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Digital learning platform evaluation criteria
|
|
||||||
- FERPA and student data privacy requirements
|
|
||||||
- Accessibility standards for educational technology (WCAG)
|
|
||||||
- Teacher professional development and training resources
|
|
||||||
- Digital equity and inclusion best practices
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- Department of Education technology guidelines
|
|
||||||
- EdTech research organizations and publications
|
|
||||||
- Accessibility compliance resources (Section 508, WCAG)
|
|
||||||
- Professional development frameworks for educators
|
|
||||||
- Digital equity research and case studies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `edtech-implementation-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the key evaluation criteria for selecting learning platforms?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should student data privacy be protected in digital learning?"
|
|
||||||
- "What accessibility features are required for inclusive education?"
|
|
||||||
- "What training approach works best for teacher adoption?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can digital equity gaps be addressed effectively?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Platform selection criteria and evaluation framework
|
|
||||||
- Student data privacy compliance requirements
|
|
||||||
- Accessibility standards and implementation guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Teacher training and professional development strategies
|
|
||||||
- Digital equity initiatives and best practices
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for education/edtech industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `edtech-implementation-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with education/edtech industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in education/edtech
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Education Technology - Digital Learning Platform Research
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for education/edtech workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for education/edtech industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 09: Construction - Workplace Safety & OSHA Compliance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Construction
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Safety Manager
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research OSHA regulations and safety best practices for commercial construction projects
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're the safety manager for a construction company working on high-rise commercial buildings. With recent OSHA updates and increasing safety requirements, you need to research current safety regulations, fall protection standards, and hazard communication requirements.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `construction-safety-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- OSHA construction safety standards (29 CFR Part 1926)
|
|
||||||
- Fall protection and scaffolding safety requirements
|
|
||||||
- Hazard communication and chemical safety protocols
|
|
||||||
- Personal protective equipment (PPE) standards
|
|
||||||
- Safety training and certification requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- OSHA.gov construction safety standards
|
|
||||||
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Construction industry safety organizations
|
|
||||||
- Safety training and certification programs
|
|
||||||
- Construction accident prevention resources
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `construction-safety-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the current fall protection requirements for heights over 6 feet?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should hazardous chemicals be communicated to workers?"
|
|
||||||
- "What PPE is required for different construction activities?"
|
|
||||||
- "How often must safety training be conducted and documented?"
|
|
||||||
- "What are the inspection requirements for scaffolding and equipment?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- OSHA compliance requirements and recent updates
|
|
||||||
- Fall protection and scaffolding safety procedures
|
|
||||||
- Hazard communication and chemical safety protocols
|
|
||||||
- PPE selection and usage guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Safety training and documentation requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for construction industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `construction-safety-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with construction industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in construction
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Construction - Workplace Safety & OSHA Compliance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for construction workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for construction industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 10: Nonprofit - Grant Writing & Fundraising Strategy
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Nonprofit/Social Services
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Development Director
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research grant opportunities and fundraising best practices for environmental conservation programs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're the development director at an environmental conservation nonprofit. Your organization needs to expand funding sources and develop comprehensive grant writing strategies to support habitat restoration and education programs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `nonprofit-fundraising-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Federal and state environmental grant programs
|
|
||||||
- Foundation giving guidelines and priorities
|
|
||||||
- Grant writing best practices and templates
|
|
||||||
- Nonprofit fundraising strategies and case studies
|
|
||||||
- Impact measurement and reporting frameworks
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- Federal grant databases (Grants.gov, EPA grants)
|
|
||||||
- Foundation directories and giving databases
|
|
||||||
- Nonprofit fundraising organizations and resources
|
|
||||||
- Grant writing training materials and guides
|
|
||||||
- Impact measurement and evaluation resources
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `nonprofit-fundraising-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What federal grants are available for habitat restoration projects?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should environmental impact be measured and reported?"
|
|
||||||
- "What elements make grant proposals most successful?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can donor retention rates be improved?"
|
|
||||||
- "What matching fund requirements exist for environmental grants?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Grant opportunity identification and assessment
|
|
||||||
- Proposal writing strategies and best practices
|
|
||||||
- Impact measurement and evaluation frameworks
|
|
||||||
- Donor engagement and retention strategies
|
|
||||||
- Compliance and reporting requirements for grants
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for nonprofit/social services industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `nonprofit-fundraising-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with nonprofit/social services industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in nonprofit/social services
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Nonprofit - Grant Writing & Fundraising Strategy
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for nonprofit/social services workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for nonprofit/social services industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 11: Cybersecurity - Framework Implementation & Risk Assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Cybersecurity/IT
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Information Security Manager
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research cybersecurity frameworks and compliance requirements for financial services organization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're implementing a comprehensive cybersecurity program for a financial services company. You need to research security frameworks (NIST, ISO 27001), compliance requirements, and risk assessment methodologies to protect customer data and meet regulatory obligations.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `cybersecurity-framework-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework documentation
|
|
||||||
- ISO 27001 information security standards
|
|
||||||
- Financial services cybersecurity regulations
|
|
||||||
- Risk assessment methodologies and tools
|
|
||||||
- Incident response planning and procedures
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- NIST cybersecurity framework and guidelines
|
|
||||||
- ISO 27001 documentation and certification guides
|
|
||||||
- Financial industry cybersecurity regulations
|
|
||||||
- Cybersecurity risk assessment frameworks
|
|
||||||
- Incident response and business continuity resources
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `cybersecurity-framework-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "How should the NIST Framework be implemented in financial services?"
|
|
||||||
- "What are the key controls required by ISO 27001?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should cybersecurity risks be assessed and prioritized?"
|
|
||||||
- "What incident response procedures are required?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can employee security awareness be improved?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Framework implementation roadmap and priorities
|
|
||||||
- Security control selection and implementation
|
|
||||||
- Risk assessment methodology and tools
|
|
||||||
- Incident response and recovery procedures
|
|
||||||
- Employee training and awareness strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for cybersecurity/it industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `cybersecurity-framework-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with cybersecurity/it industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in cybersecurity/it
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Cybersecurity - Framework Implementation & Risk Assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for cybersecurity/it workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for cybersecurity/it industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 12: Retail E-commerce - Digital Marketing & Customer Experience
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Retail/E-commerce
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Digital Marketing Manager
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research digital marketing strategies and customer experience optimization for online retail
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're managing digital marketing for a growing e-commerce retailer specializing in sustainable home goods. You need to research modern digital marketing techniques, customer experience optimization, and data privacy compliance to increase sales and improve customer satisfaction.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `ecommerce-marketing-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Digital marketing best practices and case studies
|
|
||||||
- E-commerce conversion optimization techniques
|
|
||||||
- Customer experience design and journey mapping
|
|
||||||
- Data privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA) for e-commerce
|
|
||||||
- Social media marketing and influencer strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- Digital marketing industry publications and guides
|
|
||||||
- E-commerce platform documentation and best practices
|
|
||||||
- Customer experience research organizations
|
|
||||||
- Data privacy and compliance resources
|
|
||||||
- Social media marketing and advertising platforms
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `ecommerce-marketing-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the most effective customer acquisition strategies for e-commerce?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can website conversion rates be optimized?"
|
|
||||||
- "What data privacy compliance is required for customer data?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should customer journey mapping be conducted?"
|
|
||||||
- "What social media strategies work best for sustainable products?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Digital marketing strategy and channel optimization
|
|
||||||
- Website conversion optimization techniques
|
|
||||||
- Customer experience improvement recommendations
|
|
||||||
- Data privacy compliance requirements and procedures
|
|
||||||
- Social media and content marketing strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for retail/e-commerce industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `ecommerce-marketing-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with retail/e-commerce industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in retail/e-commerce
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Retail E-commerce - Digital Marketing & Customer Experience
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for retail/e-commerce workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for retail/e-commerce industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 13: Hospitality - Hotel Operations & Guest Experience Management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Hospitality/Tourism
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Hotel Operations Manager
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research hotel operations best practices and guest experience optimization strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're managing operations for a boutique hotel chain focusing on sustainable tourism. You need to research modern hotel management practices, guest experience optimization, sustainability initiatives, and staff training programs to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `hotel-operations-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Hotel operations management best practices
|
|
||||||
- Guest experience optimization and service design
|
|
||||||
- Sustainable hospitality practices and certifications
|
|
||||||
- Staff training and development programs
|
|
||||||
- Revenue management and pricing strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- Hospitality industry associations and publications
|
|
||||||
- Hotel management training resources
|
|
||||||
- Sustainable tourism certification organizations
|
|
||||||
- Guest experience and service design resources
|
|
||||||
- Revenue management and hospitality technology guides
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `hotel-operations-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the key performance indicators for hotel operations?"
|
|
||||||
- "How can guest satisfaction scores be improved?"
|
|
||||||
- "What sustainable practices can reduce operational costs?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should staff training programs be structured?"
|
|
||||||
- "What revenue management strategies maximize profitability?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Operational efficiency metrics and improvement strategies
|
|
||||||
- Guest experience enhancement recommendations
|
|
||||||
- Sustainability initiatives and certification requirements
|
|
||||||
- Staff development and training program design
|
|
||||||
- Revenue optimization and pricing strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for hospitality/tourism industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `hotel-operations-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with hospitality/tourism industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in hospitality/tourism
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Hospitality - Hotel Operations & Guest Experience Management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for hospitality/tourism workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for hospitality/tourism industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 14: Software Development - API Design & Documentation Best Practices
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Software Development/Tech
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Technical Lead
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research API design patterns and documentation strategies for microservices architecture
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're leading the development of a microservices platform for a SaaS company. You need to research REST API design best practices, OpenAPI documentation standards, authentication patterns, and testing strategies to ensure scalable and maintainable system architecture.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `api-design-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- REST API design principles and best practices
|
|
||||||
- OpenAPI specification and documentation standards
|
|
||||||
- API authentication and security patterns
|
|
||||||
- Microservices architecture design guidelines
|
|
||||||
- API testing and monitoring strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- API design and development best practices guides
|
|
||||||
- OpenAPI and Swagger documentation resources
|
|
||||||
- Microservices architecture patterns and case studies
|
|
||||||
- API security and authentication frameworks
|
|
||||||
- Software testing and quality assurance resources
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `api-design-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the REST API design principles for scalable systems?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should API documentation be structured using OpenAPI?"
|
|
||||||
- "What authentication patterns work best for microservices?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should API versioning be managed?"
|
|
||||||
- "What testing strategies ensure API reliability?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- API design patterns and architectural principles
|
|
||||||
- Documentation standards and tooling recommendations
|
|
||||||
- Security and authentication implementation strategies
|
|
||||||
- Version management and backward compatibility
|
|
||||||
- Testing and monitoring framework recommendations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for software development/tech industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `api-design-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with software development/tech industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in software development/tech
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Software Development - API Design & Documentation Best Practices
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for software development/tech workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for software development/tech industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Test Scenario 15: Environmental Consulting - Impact Assessment & Remediation Planning
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: Environmental Consulting
|
|
||||||
**Role**: Environmental Scientist
|
|
||||||
**Task**: Research environmental impact assessment methodologies and soil contamination remediation techniques
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
You're an environmental scientist working on a contaminated industrial site remediation project. You need to research environmental impact assessment procedures, soil contamination analysis methods, and remediation technologies to develop a comprehensive cleanup plan.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `environmental-assessment-research` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
- Environmental impact assessment (EIA) guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Soil contamination testing and analysis procedures
|
|
||||||
- Remediation technology options and case studies
|
|
||||||
- EPA regulations for contaminated site cleanup
|
|
||||||
- Groundwater monitoring and protection strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:
|
|
||||||
- EPA environmental assessment and remediation guidelines
|
|
||||||
- Environmental consulting industry standards
|
|
||||||
- Soil science and remediation technology research
|
|
||||||
- Groundwater protection and monitoring resources
|
|
||||||
- Environmental impact assessment methodologies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `environmental-assessment-research` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:
|
|
||||||
- "What are the standard procedures for environmental impact assessment?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should soil contamination be analyzed and categorized?"
|
|
||||||
- "What remediation technologies are most effective for industrial contamination?"
|
|
||||||
- "What monitoring is required during and after remediation?"
|
|
||||||
- "How should community stakeholders be engaged in the process?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
- Environmental impact assessment framework and procedures
|
|
||||||
- Soil contamination analysis and risk assessment methods
|
|
||||||
- Remediation technology selection and implementation
|
|
||||||
- Monitoring and compliance requirements
|
|
||||||
- Stakeholder engagement and communication strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for environmental consulting industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `environmental-assessment-research/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with environmental consulting industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in environmental consulting
|
|
||||||
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Results Placeholder - Environmental Consulting - Impact Assessment & Remediation Planning
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for environmental consulting workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for environmental consulting industry applications*
|
|
||||||
@ -1,144 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Agent Testing Completion Workflow Template
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Universal Completion Steps for All Scenarios**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 8: Document Your Experience**
|
|
||||||
Create a comprehensive `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Executive Summary**
|
|
||||||
- What you built ([Industry-Specific Intelligence System])
|
|
||||||
- Key findings and success metrics
|
|
||||||
- Professional impact assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Technical Details**
|
|
||||||
- Number of documents indexed and file sizes
|
|
||||||
- Search response times and accuracy ratings
|
|
||||||
- Most effective query types and examples
|
|
||||||
- Command usage statistics (init, search, stats, info, find-function, find-class, update)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Professional Value Assessment**
|
|
||||||
- Time saved compared to manual document searching
|
|
||||||
- Potential impact on [industry-specific processes]
|
|
||||||
- Training value for new [professionals]
|
|
||||||
- [Industry-specific compliance/workflow] improvements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **User Experience Report**
|
|
||||||
- Installation process evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Command usability ratings
|
|
||||||
- Documentation quality assessment
|
|
||||||
- Suggested improvements or missing features
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 9: Repository Contribution Workflow**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Repository Information**
|
|
||||||
- **Repository URL**: `http://192.168.1.3:3000/foxadmin/fss-mini-rag-github.git`
|
|
||||||
- **Main Branch**: `main`
|
|
||||||
- **Testing Branch**: `agent-user-testing` (where scenarios are located)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Branch Management**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Clone the repository
|
|
||||||
git clone http://192.168.1.3:3000/foxadmin/fss-mini-rag-github.git
|
|
||||||
cd fss-mini-rag-github
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Start from the agent-user-testing branch
|
|
||||||
git checkout agent-user-testing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Create your own branch for your results
|
|
||||||
git checkout -b agent-test-[SCENARIO-NAME]-$(date +%Y%m%d)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Navigate to your scenario
|
|
||||||
cd agent-user-testing/[XX-scenario-folder]/
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Submit Your Results**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Add your completed RESULTS.md
|
|
||||||
git add RESULTS.md
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Commit with descriptive message
|
|
||||||
git commit -m "Agent Test Results: [Industry] [System Name]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Tested FSS-Mini-RAG with [industry-specific] documentation
|
|
||||||
- Created intelligent knowledge base for [specific use cases]
|
|
||||||
- Evaluated semantic search effectiveness for [industry] workflows
|
|
||||||
- Documented professional impact and time-saving potential
|
|
||||||
- Rating: [X]/10 overall effectiveness"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Push your branch
|
|
||||||
git push origin agent-test-[SCENARIO-NAME]-$(date +%Y%m%d)
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Create Pull Request**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Use gitea CLI to create PR
|
|
||||||
gitea prs create "Agent Test: [Industry] Results" agent-test-[SCENARIO-NAME]-$(date +%Y%m%d) agent-user-testing --body "Completed comprehensive testing of FSS-Mini-RAG for [industry] workflows.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Summary
|
|
||||||
- Built [Intelligence System Name]
|
|
||||||
- Indexed [X] [industry] documents
|
|
||||||
- Tested [X] search queries with [X]% accuracy
|
|
||||||
- Overall effectiveness rating: [X]/10
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Findings
|
|
||||||
[Brief summary of major discoveries]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Impact
|
|
||||||
[Assessment of real-world value for [professionals]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Recommendations
|
|
||||||
[Suggestions for improvements or additional features]"
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 10: Validation Requirements**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Your submission must include:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Required Evidence**
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Screenshots** of successful `rag-mini init` and `rag-mini stats` output
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Search examples** with actual query results (at least 5 different searches)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Performance metrics** (response times, index size, document count)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Professional assessment** with specific use cases and value propositions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Quality Standards**
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Functional completeness**: All major commands tested (init, search, stats, info)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Real-world relevance**: Actual industry documents and realistic queries
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Professional writing**: Clear, actionable insights for [industry] teams
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Quantitative data**: Specific metrics and measurable outcomes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Submission Checklist**
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Created intelligent knowledge base successfully
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Tested minimum 5 different search queries
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Documented all command usage and results
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Provided professional impact assessment
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Created proper git branch with descriptive name
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Submitted PR with comprehensive description
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Included evidence screenshots/outputs
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Met all validation requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Final Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `[industry-folder]/` with indexed documentation
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with comprehensive evaluation and evidence
|
|
||||||
- Git branch with proper commit history
|
|
||||||
- Pull request with detailed description
|
|
||||||
- Professional assessment of FSS-Mini-RAG effectiveness
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 3-4 hours (including documentation and PR submission)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎉 **Success Outcome**
|
|
||||||
You'll have created an **intelligent [industry] assistant** AND provided valuable feedback to improve FSS-Mini-RAG for [industry] professionals!
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🔧 **Customization Variables**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For each scenario, replace:
|
|
||||||
- `[Industry-Specific Intelligence System]` - e.g., "CAD Standards Intelligence System"
|
|
||||||
- `[SCENARIO-NAME]` - e.g., "mechanical-engineering"
|
|
||||||
- `[XX-scenario-folder]` - e.g., "01-mechanical-engineering"
|
|
||||||
- `[industry-specific]` - e.g., "automotive CAD standards"
|
|
||||||
- `[specific use cases]` - e.g., "tolerance and design queries"
|
|
||||||
- `[industry]` - e.g., "mechanical engineering"
|
|
||||||
- `[professionals]` - e.g., "engineers"
|
|
||||||
- `[Intelligence System Name]` - e.g., "CAD Standards Intelligence System"
|
|
||||||
- `[industry-folder]` - e.g., "cad-standards-docs"
|
|
||||||
@ -1,167 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# FSS-Mini-RAG Agent User Testing Scenarios
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Testing Overview**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This directory contains 15 comprehensive real-world testing scenarios designed for autonomous agent execution. Each scenario simulates a professional user from a different industry using FSS-Mini-RAG to solve authentic research challenges.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Test Scenario Categories**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Engineering & Manufacturing** 🔧
|
|
||||||
- **01-mechanical-engineering**: CAD standards and automotive component design research
|
|
||||||
- **03-plant-logistics**: Warehouse optimization and supply chain management
|
|
||||||
- **09-construction-safety**: OSHA compliance and workplace safety protocols
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Healthcare & Life Sciences** 🏥
|
|
||||||
- **05-medical-research**: Clinical trial protocol development and FDA regulations
|
|
||||||
- **15-environmental-consulting**: Impact assessment and soil remediation planning
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Financial & Legal Services** 💼
|
|
||||||
- **04-financial-compliance**: SEC regulations and investment advisory compliance
|
|
||||||
- **06-real-estate-development**: Zoning regulations and environmental requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Education & Social Services** 🎓
|
|
||||||
- **02-childcare-regulations**: Licensing requirements and safety compliance
|
|
||||||
- **08-education-technology**: Digital learning platform implementation
|
|
||||||
- **10-nonprofit-fundraising**: Grant writing and fundraising strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Technology & Digital Services** 💻
|
|
||||||
- **11-cybersecurity-compliance**: Security frameworks and risk assessment
|
|
||||||
- **12-retail-ecommerce**: Digital marketing and customer experience optimization
|
|
||||||
- **14-software-development**: API design and microservices architecture
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Hospitality & Agriculture** 🌱
|
|
||||||
- **07-agriculture-sustainability**: Organic farming and sustainable practices
|
|
||||||
- **13-hospitality-operations**: Hotel management and guest experience
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏗️ **Scenario Structure**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each scenario follows a standardized structure:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
XX-scenario-name/
|
|
||||||
├── INSTRUCTIONS.md # Complete autonomous task instructions
|
|
||||||
└── RESULTS.md # Placeholder for agent findings
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Standard Workflow**
|
|
||||||
1. **Setup**: Agent installs FSS-Mini-RAG following README instructions
|
|
||||||
2. **Research**: Agent gathers industry-specific documentation (3-5 sources)
|
|
||||||
3. **Index**: Agent creates RAG index of research materials
|
|
||||||
4. **Query**: Agent performs 5 targeted searches for domain-specific questions
|
|
||||||
5. **Analyze**: Agent documents findings and evaluates FSS-Mini-RAG effectiveness
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🤖 **Agent Deployment Guide**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Prerequisites**
|
|
||||||
- Agent must read the main repository README.md first
|
|
||||||
- Agent should have access to internet for research material gathering
|
|
||||||
- Agent needs ability to create directories and download files
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Deployment Command Structure**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Example agent delegation command
|
|
||||||
agent-launch [AGENT_TYPE] "agent-user-testing/XX-scenario-name/INSTRUCTIONS.md" "/MASTERFOLDER/Coding/Fss-Mini-Rag" "agent-user-testing/XX-scenario-name/RESULTS.md"
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Recommended Agent Types by Scenario**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Scenario | Recommended Agent Type | Rationale |
|
|
||||||
|----------|----------------------|-----------|
|
|
||||||
| 01-mechanical-engineering | michael-technical-implementation | Technical analysis expertise |
|
|
||||||
| 02-childcare-regulations | quality-assurance | Regulatory compliance focus |
|
|
||||||
| 03-plant-logistics | michael-technical-implementation | Operations optimization |
|
|
||||||
| 04-financial-compliance | emma-auth-specialist | Security and compliance expertise |
|
|
||||||
| 05-medical-research | quality-assurance | Regulatory requirements focus |
|
|
||||||
| 06-real-estate-development | project-structure-specialist | Documentation organization |
|
|
||||||
| 07-agriculture-sustainability | quality-assurance | Best practices analysis |
|
|
||||||
| 08-education-technology | michael-technical-implementation | EdTech implementation |
|
|
||||||
| 09-construction-safety | quality-assurance | Safety compliance expertise |
|
|
||||||
| 10-nonprofit-fundraising | project-structure-specialist | Document organization |
|
|
||||||
| 11-cybersecurity-compliance | emma-auth-specialist | Security frameworks |
|
|
||||||
| 12-retail-ecommerce | michael-technical-implementation | Technical marketing analysis |
|
|
||||||
| 13-hospitality-operations | quality-assurance | Operations best practices |
|
|
||||||
| 14-software-development | michael-technical-implementation | Technical architecture |
|
|
||||||
| 15-environmental-consulting | quality-assurance | Environmental compliance |
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📊 **Testing Objectives**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Primary Goals**
|
|
||||||
1. **Usability Testing**: Validate installation and setup process across different user types
|
|
||||||
2. **Domain Effectiveness**: Test FSS-Mini-RAG performance with industry-specific content
|
|
||||||
3. **Search Quality**: Evaluate semantic search accuracy for professional queries
|
|
||||||
4. **Documentation Quality**: Assess README clarity and instruction completeness
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Success Criteria**
|
|
||||||
- **Installation Success**: Agent successfully installs FSS-Mini-RAG on first attempt
|
|
||||||
- **Research Completion**: Agent gathers appropriate domain materials (3-5 sources)
|
|
||||||
- **Indexing Success**: Agent successfully creates RAG index without errors
|
|
||||||
- **Query Effectiveness**: Agent finds relevant answers to domain-specific questions
|
|
||||||
- **Professional Relevance**: Agent evaluation confirms real-world applicability
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Evaluation Metrics**
|
|
||||||
- Installation time and success rate
|
|
||||||
- Research material quality and relevance
|
|
||||||
- Search result accuracy and usefulness
|
|
||||||
- Overall user experience rating
|
|
||||||
- Industry-specific value assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Real-World Applicability**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each scenario represents authentic professional challenges:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **High-Stakes Industries** 🚨
|
|
||||||
- **Healthcare**: Clinical trials with FDA compliance requirements
|
|
||||||
- **Financial Services**: SEC regulatory compliance with penalty avoidance
|
|
||||||
- **Construction**: OSHA safety compliance with liability implications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Operational Excellence** 📈
|
|
||||||
- **Manufacturing**: Supply chain optimization for cost reduction
|
|
||||||
- **Agriculture**: Sustainable practices for long-term viability
|
|
||||||
- **Hospitality**: Guest experience optimization for revenue growth
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Technology Integration** 💡
|
|
||||||
- **Education**: EdTech implementation for improved learning outcomes
|
|
||||||
- **Cybersecurity**: Framework implementation for risk mitigation
|
|
||||||
- **Software Development**: API design for scalable architecture
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🚀 **Execution Timeline**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Sequential Testing** (Recommended)
|
|
||||||
- **Week 1**: Engineering & Manufacturing (scenarios 01, 03, 09)
|
|
||||||
- **Week 2**: Healthcare & Life Sciences (scenarios 05, 15)
|
|
||||||
- **Week 3**: Financial & Legal Services (scenarios 04, 06)
|
|
||||||
- **Week 4**: Education & Social Services (scenarios 02, 08, 10)
|
|
||||||
- **Week 5**: Technology & Digital Services (scenarios 11, 12, 14)
|
|
||||||
- **Week 6**: Hospitality & Agriculture (scenarios 07, 13)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Parallel Testing** (Accelerated)
|
|
||||||
- Deploy 3-5 agents simultaneously with different scenarios
|
|
||||||
- Focus on diverse industry representation
|
|
||||||
- Prioritize high-impact scenarios first
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📈 **Expected Outcomes**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Validation Results**
|
|
||||||
- **Installation Process**: Identify pain points and improvement opportunities
|
|
||||||
- **Industry Fit**: Confirm FSS-Mini-RAG value across professional domains
|
|
||||||
- **Feature Gaps**: Discover missing functionality for specific use cases
|
|
||||||
- **Documentation Improvements**: Enhance user guidance and examples
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Product Insights**
|
|
||||||
- **Search Accuracy**: Performance with domain-specific terminology
|
|
||||||
- **Content Type Effectiveness**: PDF, documentation, regulations handling
|
|
||||||
- **User Experience**: Professional workflow integration potential
|
|
||||||
- **Scalability Assessment**: Multi-document, large corpus performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎉 **Success Impact**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
These testing scenarios will:
|
|
||||||
- **Validate Market Fit**: Confirm FSS-Mini-RAG value across industries
|
|
||||||
- **Improve User Experience**: Identify and resolve usability issues
|
|
||||||
- **Enhance Documentation**: Create industry-specific usage examples
|
|
||||||
- **Guide Feature Development**: Prioritize improvements based on real needs
|
|
||||||
- **Build Confidence**: Demonstrate professional-grade reliability
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Ready to deploy? Each scenario is completely autonomous and designed for independent agent execution. Choose your starting scenarios and delegate with confidence!** 🚀
|
|
||||||
@ -1,401 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
Enhance all agent testing scenarios with functional demonstrations,
|
|
||||||
comprehensive command testing, and professional completion workflows.
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import os
|
|
||||||
import re
|
|
||||||
from pathlib import Path
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Scenario enhancements with functional demonstrations
|
|
||||||
scenario_enhancements = {
|
|
||||||
"02-childcare-regulations": {
|
|
||||||
"title": "Childcare Center - Regulatory Compliance Intelligence",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Build a smart regulatory compliance assistant that instantly answers licensing questions",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're opening a new childcare center and drowning in regulatory requirements from multiple agencies. You'll use FSS-Mini-RAG to create an intelligent compliance system that can instantly answer any licensing, safety, or operational question.",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "childcare-compliance-docs",
|
|
||||||
"system_name": "Childcare Compliance Intelligence System",
|
|
||||||
"commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What is the minimum square footage required per child in play areas?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What background check requirements exist for childcare staff?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What are the handwashing and sanitation requirements?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "How many emergency exits are required for a 50-child facility?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What staff-to-child ratios are mandated for different age groups?"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"advanced_commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-function "safety_checklist"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-class "ComplianceRecord"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"professional_impact": [
|
|
||||||
"How much time would this save during licensing preparation?",
|
|
||||||
"Could this help ensure full compliance and avoid violations?",
|
|
||||||
"What would be the value for training new childcare staff?"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
"03-plant-logistics": {
|
|
||||||
"title": "Plant Logistics - Warehouse Intelligence System",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Build a smart logistics assistant that optimizes warehouse operations and supply chain efficiency",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're managing a manufacturing plant with supply chain bottlenecks and warehouse inefficiencies. You'll use FSS-Mini-RAG to create an intelligent operations system that can instantly provide optimization strategies and best practices.",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "logistics-optimization-docs",
|
|
||||||
"system_name": "Warehouse Operations Intelligence System",
|
|
||||||
"commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What are the key principles of efficient warehouse layout design?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "How can Just-In-Time inventory reduce carrying costs?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What metrics should be used to measure supply chain performance?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "How can automation improve warehouse picking accuracy?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What strategies reduce supply chain disruption risks?"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"advanced_commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-function "inventory_optimization"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-class "SupplyChainMetrics"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"professional_impact": [
|
|
||||||
"How much cost savings could these optimizations provide?",
|
|
||||||
"Could this help reduce inventory carrying costs and waste?",
|
|
||||||
"What would be the value for training logistics coordinators?"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
"04-financial-compliance": {
|
|
||||||
"title": "Financial Services - Regulatory Intelligence Hub",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Build a smart financial compliance assistant that navigates complex SEC and FINRA regulations",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're a compliance officer drowning in ever-changing financial regulations. You'll use FSS-Mini-RAG to create an intelligent regulatory system that can instantly answer any compliance question and keep you ahead of regulatory changes.",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "financial-regulations-docs",
|
|
||||||
"system_name": "Financial Compliance Intelligence Hub",
|
|
||||||
"commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What are the reporting requirements for Form ADV updates?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "How often must AML policies be reviewed and updated?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What cybersecurity measures are required for client data protection?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What documentation is required for demonstrating fiduciary duty?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What are the penalties for non-compliance with SEC regulations?"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"advanced_commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-function "compliance_check"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-class "RegulatoryRequirement"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"professional_impact": [
|
|
||||||
"How much time would this save during compliance reviews?",
|
|
||||||
"Could this help avoid costly regulatory violations?",
|
|
||||||
"What would be the value for training compliance staff?"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
"05-medical-research": {
|
|
||||||
"title": "Medical Research - Clinical Trial Intelligence System",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Build a smart clinical research assistant that navigates FDA regulations and GCP guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're coordinating clinical trials and struggling with complex FDA requirements and GCP guidelines. You'll use FSS-Mini-RAG to create an intelligent research system that can instantly answer any protocol, safety, or regulatory question.",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "clinical-research-docs",
|
|
||||||
"system_name": "Clinical Trial Intelligence System",
|
|
||||||
"commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What are the FDA requirements for Phase II trial design?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "How should adverse events be classified and reported?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What statistical power calculations are needed for efficacy endpoints?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "What informed consent elements are required?"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini search "How should patient eligibility criteria be defined?"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"advanced_commands": [
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-function "adverse_event_report"',
|
|
||||||
'rag-mini find-class "TrialProtocol"'
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"professional_impact": [
|
|
||||||
"How much time would this save during protocol development?",
|
|
||||||
"Could this help ensure FDA compliance and patient safety?",
|
|
||||||
"What would be the value for training clinical research coordinators?"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Add more scenarios here...
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def create_functional_instructions(scenario_id, enhancement):
|
|
||||||
"""Create functional instructions with comprehensive command testing."""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions = f"""# Test Scenario {scenario_id.split('-')[0].zfill(2)}: {enhancement['title']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: {enhancement['title'].split(' - ')[0]}
|
|
||||||
**Role**: {get_role_from_title(enhancement['title'])}
|
|
||||||
**Task**: {enhancement['task']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
{enhancement['description']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Industry Documentation**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `{enhancement['folder']}` and populate it with relevant documentation:
|
|
||||||
{get_materials_list(scenario_id)}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Pro tip**: Look for PDF documents, technical guides, and industry best practices.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Build Your Intelligent Knowledge Base**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Navigate to your research folder
|
|
||||||
cd {enhancement['folder']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Initialize FSS-Mini-RAG index
|
|
||||||
rag-mini init
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Check the index was created successfully
|
|
||||||
rag-mini stats
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Get system info to verify everything is working
|
|
||||||
rag-mini info
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Test Your Intelligence System**
|
|
||||||
Now for the cool part - your documentation is now searchable with natural language! Test these queries:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```bash"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Add search commands
|
|
||||||
for cmd in enhancement['commands']:
|
|
||||||
instructions += f"\n# {get_command_description(cmd)}\n{cmd}\n"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions += f"""```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Advanced Searches**
|
|
||||||
Try these more sophisticated queries:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```bash"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Add advanced commands
|
|
||||||
for cmd in enhancement['advanced_commands']:
|
|
||||||
instructions += f"\n# {get_advanced_description(cmd)}\n{cmd}\n"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions += f"""
|
|
||||||
# Update your knowledge base (when you add new documents)
|
|
||||||
rag-mini update
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Get detailed statistics about your knowledge base
|
|
||||||
rag-mini stats
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 6: Document Your Intelligence System**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Knowledge Base Performance**
|
|
||||||
- How many documents were indexed?
|
|
||||||
- How fast were the search responses?
|
|
||||||
- Which types of questions worked best?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Professional Value**
|
|
||||||
{get_professional_questions(enhancement['professional_impact'])}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Professional Impact**
|
|
||||||
{get_impact_questions(enhancement['professional_impact'])}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{get_completion_workflow(scenario_id, enhancement)}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Final Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `{enhancement['folder']}/` folder with indexed documentation
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with comprehensive evaluation and evidence
|
|
||||||
- Git branch with proper commit history
|
|
||||||
- Pull request with detailed description
|
|
||||||
- Professional assessment of FSS-Mini-RAG effectiveness
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 3-4 hours (including documentation and PR submission)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎉 **Success Outcome**
|
|
||||||
You'll have created an **intelligent {enhancement['system_name'].lower()}** AND provided valuable feedback to improve FSS-Mini-RAG for industry professionals!
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Experience semantic search with industry-specific content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate AI-powered documentation assistance for professional workflows
|
|
||||||
- Test real-world applicability of RAG systems in your industry
|
|
||||||
- Practice professional software evaluation and contribution workflows"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return instructions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def get_role_from_title(title):
|
|
||||||
"""Extract role from title."""
|
|
||||||
roles = {
|
|
||||||
"Childcare": "Childcare Center Director",
|
|
||||||
"Plant": "Logistics Coordinator",
|
|
||||||
"Financial": "Compliance Officer",
|
|
||||||
"Medical": "Clinical Research Coordinator",
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for key, role in roles.items():
|
|
||||||
if key in title:
|
|
||||||
return role
|
|
||||||
return "Professional"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def get_materials_list(scenario_id):
|
|
||||||
"""Get materials list based on scenario."""
|
|
||||||
# This would be customized per scenario
|
|
||||||
return "- Relevant industry documentation\n- Standards and guidelines\n- Best practices documents\n- Regulatory requirements\n- Technical specifications"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def get_command_description(cmd):
|
|
||||||
"""Get description for search command."""
|
|
||||||
return f"Search for specific information"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def get_advanced_description(cmd):
|
|
||||||
"""Get description for advanced command."""
|
|
||||||
return f"Advanced search functionality"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def get_professional_questions(impact_list):
|
|
||||||
"""Format professional impact questions."""
|
|
||||||
return "\n".join([f"- {q}" for q in impact_list])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def get_impact_questions(impact_list):
|
|
||||||
"""Get impact assessment questions."""
|
|
||||||
return "\n".join([f"- {q}" for q in impact_list])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def get_completion_workflow(scenario_id, enhancement):
|
|
||||||
"""Get the completion workflow with repository details."""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
scenario_name = scenario_id.replace('-', '_')
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return f"""
|
|
||||||
### **Step 7: Complete Professional Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- **Finding specific industry information** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
- **Answering domain-specific questions** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
- **Helping with workflow optimization** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
- **Overall usefulness for your industry** (1-10)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 8: Document Your Experience**
|
|
||||||
Create a comprehensive `RESULTS.md` including:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Executive Summary**
|
|
||||||
- What you built ({enhancement['system_name']})
|
|
||||||
- Key findings and success metrics
|
|
||||||
- Professional impact assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Technical Details**
|
|
||||||
- Number of documents indexed and file sizes
|
|
||||||
- Search response times and accuracy ratings
|
|
||||||
- Most effective query types and examples
|
|
||||||
- Command usage statistics (init, search, stats, info, find-function, find-class, update)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Professional Value Assessment**
|
|
||||||
- Time saved compared to manual document searching
|
|
||||||
- Potential impact on industry-specific processes
|
|
||||||
- Training value for new professionals
|
|
||||||
- Industry-specific compliance/workflow improvements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **User Experience Report**
|
|
||||||
- Installation process evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Command usability ratings
|
|
||||||
- Documentation quality assessment
|
|
||||||
- Suggested improvements or missing features
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 9: Repository Contribution Workflow**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Repository Information**
|
|
||||||
- **Repository URL**: `http://192.168.1.3:3000/foxadmin/fss-mini-rag-github.git`
|
|
||||||
- **Main Branch**: `main`
|
|
||||||
- **Testing Branch**: `agent-user-testing` (where scenarios are located)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Branch Management**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Clone the repository
|
|
||||||
git clone http://192.168.1.3:3000/foxadmin/fss-mini-rag-github.git
|
|
||||||
cd fss-mini-rag-github
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Start from the agent-user-testing branch
|
|
||||||
git checkout agent-user-testing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Create your own branch for your results
|
|
||||||
git checkout -b agent-test-{scenario_name}-$(date +%Y%m%d)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Navigate to your scenario
|
|
||||||
cd agent-user-testing/{scenario_id}/
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Submit Your Results**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Add your completed RESULTS.md
|
|
||||||
git add RESULTS.md
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Commit with descriptive message
|
|
||||||
git commit -m "Agent Test Results: {enhancement['system_name']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Tested FSS-Mini-RAG with industry-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Created intelligent knowledge base for domain queries
|
|
||||||
- Evaluated semantic search effectiveness for professional workflows
|
|
||||||
- Documented professional impact and time-saving potential
|
|
||||||
- Rating: [X]/10 overall effectiveness"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Push your branch
|
|
||||||
git push origin agent-test-{scenario_name}-$(date +%Y%m%d)
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Create Pull Request**
|
|
||||||
```bash
|
|
||||||
# Use gitea CLI to create PR
|
|
||||||
gitea prs create "Agent Test: {enhancement['system_name']} Results" agent-test-{scenario_name}-$(date +%Y%m%d) agent-user-testing --body "Completed comprehensive testing of FSS-Mini-RAG for industry workflows.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Summary
|
|
||||||
- Built {enhancement['system_name']}
|
|
||||||
- Indexed [X] industry documents
|
|
||||||
- Tested [X] search queries with [X]% accuracy
|
|
||||||
- Overall effectiveness rating: [X]/10
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Findings
|
|
||||||
[Brief summary of major discoveries]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Impact
|
|
||||||
[Assessment of real-world value for professionals]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Recommendations
|
|
||||||
[Suggestions for improvements or additional features]"
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 10: Validation Requirements**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Your submission must include:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Required Evidence**
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Screenshots** of successful `rag-mini init` and `rag-mini stats` output
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Search examples** with actual query results (at least 5 different searches)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Performance metrics** (response times, index size, document count)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Professional assessment** with specific use cases and value propositions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Quality Standards**
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Functional completeness**: All major commands tested (init, search, stats, info)
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Real-world relevance**: Actual industry documents and realistic queries
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Professional writing**: Clear, actionable insights for industry teams
|
|
||||||
- ✅ **Quantitative data**: Specific metrics and measurable outcomes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### **Submission Checklist**
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Created intelligent knowledge base successfully
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Tested minimum 5 different search queries
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Documented all command usage and results
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Provided professional impact assessment
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Created proper git branch with descriptive name
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Submitted PR with comprehensive description
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Included evidence screenshots/outputs
|
|
||||||
- [ ] Met all validation requirements"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def main():
|
|
||||||
"""Generate enhanced instructions for key scenarios."""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print("Enhancing agent testing scenarios with functional demonstrations...")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for scenario_id, enhancement in scenario_enhancements.items():
|
|
||||||
scenario_dir = Path(f"agent-user-testing/{scenario_id}")
|
|
||||||
if scenario_dir.exists():
|
|
||||||
print(f"Enhancing scenario: {scenario_id}")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions_file = scenario_dir / "INSTRUCTIONS.md"
|
|
||||||
instructions_content = create_functional_instructions(scenario_id, enhancement)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
with open(instructions_file, 'w') as f:
|
|
||||||
f.write(instructions_content)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print(f" ✅ Updated {instructions_file}")
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
print(f" ⚠️ Scenario directory not found: {scenario_dir}")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print(f"\\nEnhanced {len(scenario_enhancements)} scenarios with functional demonstrations!")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
||||||
main()
|
|
||||||
@ -1,567 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
Generate the remaining 11 test scenarios for agent user testing
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import os
|
|
||||||
from pathlib import Path
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Define the remaining scenarios
|
|
||||||
scenarios = [
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "04-financial-compliance",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Financial Services - Regulatory Compliance Research",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Financial Services",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Compliance Officer",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research financial regulations and compliance requirements for investment advisory services",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "financial-compliance-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You work as a compliance officer at a mid-size investment advisory firm. With changing regulations and recent updates to SEC requirements, you need to research current compliance standards, reporting obligations, and best practices to ensure the firm meets all regulatory requirements and avoids penalties.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"SEC regulations for investment advisors (forms ADV, compliance manuals)",
|
|
||||||
"FINRA rules and requirements documentation",
|
|
||||||
"Anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"Fiduciary duty requirements and best practices",
|
|
||||||
"Cybersecurity frameworks for financial institutions"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"SEC.gov official guidance documents",
|
|
||||||
"FINRA regulatory notices and requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Financial industry compliance handbooks",
|
|
||||||
"Cybersecurity frameworks (NIST, ISO 27001)",
|
|
||||||
"Industry compliance best practices guides"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the reporting requirements for Form ADV updates?",
|
|
||||||
"How often must AML policies be reviewed and updated?",
|
|
||||||
"What cybersecurity measures are required for client data protection?",
|
|
||||||
"What documentation is required for demonstrating fiduciary duty?",
|
|
||||||
"What are the penalties for non-compliance with SEC regulations?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Key regulatory requirements and deadlines",
|
|
||||||
"Compliance monitoring and reporting procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Risk assessment and mitigation strategies",
|
|
||||||
"Documentation and record-keeping requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Training and certification needs for staff"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "05-medical-research",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Medical Research - Clinical Trial Protocol Development",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Healthcare/Medical Research",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Clinical Research Coordinator",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research regulations and best practices for designing Phase II clinical trials",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "clinical-trial-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're a clinical research coordinator at a pharmaceutical company developing a new diabetes medication. Your team needs to design a Phase II clinical trial protocol that meets FDA requirements and follows good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"FDA clinical trial guidance documents",
|
|
||||||
"ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"IRB/Ethics committee requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Patient safety and adverse event reporting protocols",
|
|
||||||
"Statistical analysis plans for clinical trials"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"FDA.gov clinical trial guidance documents",
|
|
||||||
"International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"Good Clinical Practice training materials",
|
|
||||||
"Clinical research regulatory handbooks",
|
|
||||||
"Biostatistics and clinical trial design resources"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the FDA requirements for Phase II trial design?",
|
|
||||||
"How should adverse events be classified and reported?",
|
|
||||||
"What statistical power calculations are needed for efficacy endpoints?",
|
|
||||||
"What informed consent elements are required?",
|
|
||||||
"How should patient eligibility criteria be defined?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"FDA regulatory requirements for Phase II trials",
|
|
||||||
"Patient safety monitoring and reporting procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Statistical analysis and sample size calculations",
|
|
||||||
"Informed consent and ethical considerations",
|
|
||||||
"Protocol development timeline and milestones"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "06-real-estate-development",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Real Estate Development - Zoning & Environmental Compliance",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Real Estate Development",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Development Project Manager",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research zoning regulations and environmental requirements for mixed-use development",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "development-compliance-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're managing a mixed-use development project combining residential, commercial, and retail spaces. You need to research local zoning ordinances, environmental regulations, and permitting requirements to ensure the project meets all legal requirements.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"Local zoning ordinances and land use regulations",
|
|
||||||
"Environmental impact assessment requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Building codes and safety standards",
|
|
||||||
"Permitting processes and timelines",
|
|
||||||
"Historic preservation and cultural resource guidelines"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"City planning and zoning department documents",
|
|
||||||
"Environmental Protection Agency guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"State and local building codes",
|
|
||||||
"Historic preservation commission requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Development industry best practices guides"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the density limitations for mixed-use developments?",
|
|
||||||
"What environmental studies are required before construction?",
|
|
||||||
"How long does the permitting process typically take?",
|
|
||||||
"What parking requirements exist for mixed-use projects?",
|
|
||||||
"Are there historic preservation considerations for this site?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Zoning compliance requirements and restrictions",
|
|
||||||
"Environmental assessment and mitigation needs",
|
|
||||||
"Permitting timeline and required documentation",
|
|
||||||
"Building design and safety standards",
|
|
||||||
"Community impact and public consultation requirements"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "07-agriculture-sustainability",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Agriculture - Sustainable Farming Practices Research",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Agriculture/Farming",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Farm Operations Manager",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research sustainable farming techniques and certification requirements for organic agriculture",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "sustainable-farming-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You manage a 500-acre family farm transitioning from conventional to organic agriculture. You need to research sustainable farming practices, organic certification requirements, and soil health management techniques to ensure successful transition and long-term sustainability.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"USDA organic certification standards and procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Sustainable agriculture practices and case studies",
|
|
||||||
"Soil health assessment and improvement techniques",
|
|
||||||
"Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies",
|
|
||||||
"Water conservation and irrigation efficiency guides"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"USDA National Organic Program documentation",
|
|
||||||
"Sustainable agriculture research institutions",
|
|
||||||
"Extension service publications and guides",
|
|
||||||
"Organic farming certification bodies",
|
|
||||||
"Agricultural sustainability research papers"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What is the transition period required for organic certification?",
|
|
||||||
"Which sustainable practices provide the best soil health benefits?",
|
|
||||||
"How can integrated pest management reduce chemical inputs?",
|
|
||||||
"What water conservation techniques work best for our crop types?",
|
|
||||||
"What record-keeping is required for organic certification?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Organic certification timeline and requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Soil health improvement strategies and techniques",
|
|
||||||
"Sustainable pest and disease management approaches",
|
|
||||||
"Water conservation and efficiency measures",
|
|
||||||
"Economic analysis of sustainable farming practices"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "08-education-technology",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Education Technology - Digital Learning Platform Research",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Education/EdTech",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Educational Technology Coordinator",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research best practices for implementing digital learning platforms in K-12 education",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "edtech-implementation-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're coordinating the implementation of new digital learning platforms across a school district. You need to research best practices for EdTech integration, accessibility requirements, student data privacy regulations, and teacher training methodologies.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"Digital learning platform evaluation criteria",
|
|
||||||
"FERPA and student data privacy requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Accessibility standards for educational technology (WCAG)",
|
|
||||||
"Teacher professional development and training resources",
|
|
||||||
"Digital equity and inclusion best practices"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"Department of Education technology guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"EdTech research organizations and publications",
|
|
||||||
"Accessibility compliance resources (Section 508, WCAG)",
|
|
||||||
"Professional development frameworks for educators",
|
|
||||||
"Digital equity research and case studies"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the key evaluation criteria for selecting learning platforms?",
|
|
||||||
"How should student data privacy be protected in digital learning?",
|
|
||||||
"What accessibility features are required for inclusive education?",
|
|
||||||
"What training approach works best for teacher adoption?",
|
|
||||||
"How can digital equity gaps be addressed effectively?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Platform selection criteria and evaluation framework",
|
|
||||||
"Student data privacy compliance requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Accessibility standards and implementation guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"Teacher training and professional development strategies",
|
|
||||||
"Digital equity initiatives and best practices"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "09-construction-safety",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Construction - Workplace Safety & OSHA Compliance",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Construction",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Safety Manager",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research OSHA regulations and safety best practices for commercial construction projects",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "construction-safety-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're the safety manager for a construction company working on high-rise commercial buildings. With recent OSHA updates and increasing safety requirements, you need to research current safety regulations, fall protection standards, and hazard communication requirements.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"OSHA construction safety standards (29 CFR Part 1926)",
|
|
||||||
"Fall protection and scaffolding safety requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Hazard communication and chemical safety protocols",
|
|
||||||
"Personal protective equipment (PPE) standards",
|
|
||||||
"Safety training and certification requirements"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"OSHA.gov construction safety standards",
|
|
||||||
"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"Construction industry safety organizations",
|
|
||||||
"Safety training and certification programs",
|
|
||||||
"Construction accident prevention resources"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the current fall protection requirements for heights over 6 feet?",
|
|
||||||
"How should hazardous chemicals be communicated to workers?",
|
|
||||||
"What PPE is required for different construction activities?",
|
|
||||||
"How often must safety training be conducted and documented?",
|
|
||||||
"What are the inspection requirements for scaffolding and equipment?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"OSHA compliance requirements and recent updates",
|
|
||||||
"Fall protection and scaffolding safety procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Hazard communication and chemical safety protocols",
|
|
||||||
"PPE selection and usage guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"Safety training and documentation requirements"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "10-nonprofit-fundraising",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Nonprofit - Grant Writing & Fundraising Strategy",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Nonprofit/Social Services",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Development Director",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research grant opportunities and fundraising best practices for environmental conservation programs",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "nonprofit-fundraising-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're the development director at an environmental conservation nonprofit. Your organization needs to expand funding sources and develop comprehensive grant writing strategies to support habitat restoration and education programs.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"Federal and state environmental grant programs",
|
|
||||||
"Foundation giving guidelines and priorities",
|
|
||||||
"Grant writing best practices and templates",
|
|
||||||
"Nonprofit fundraising strategies and case studies",
|
|
||||||
"Impact measurement and reporting frameworks"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"Federal grant databases (Grants.gov, EPA grants)",
|
|
||||||
"Foundation directories and giving databases",
|
|
||||||
"Nonprofit fundraising organizations and resources",
|
|
||||||
"Grant writing training materials and guides",
|
|
||||||
"Impact measurement and evaluation resources"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What federal grants are available for habitat restoration projects?",
|
|
||||||
"How should environmental impact be measured and reported?",
|
|
||||||
"What elements make grant proposals most successful?",
|
|
||||||
"How can donor retention rates be improved?",
|
|
||||||
"What matching fund requirements exist for environmental grants?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Grant opportunity identification and assessment",
|
|
||||||
"Proposal writing strategies and best practices",
|
|
||||||
"Impact measurement and evaluation frameworks",
|
|
||||||
"Donor engagement and retention strategies",
|
|
||||||
"Compliance and reporting requirements for grants"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "11-cybersecurity-compliance",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Cybersecurity - Framework Implementation & Risk Assessment",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Cybersecurity/IT",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Information Security Manager",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research cybersecurity frameworks and compliance requirements for financial services organization",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "cybersecurity-framework-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're implementing a comprehensive cybersecurity program for a financial services company. You need to research security frameworks (NIST, ISO 27001), compliance requirements, and risk assessment methodologies to protect customer data and meet regulatory obligations.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"NIST Cybersecurity Framework documentation",
|
|
||||||
"ISO 27001 information security standards",
|
|
||||||
"Financial services cybersecurity regulations",
|
|
||||||
"Risk assessment methodologies and tools",
|
|
||||||
"Incident response planning and procedures"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"NIST cybersecurity framework and guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"ISO 27001 documentation and certification guides",
|
|
||||||
"Financial industry cybersecurity regulations",
|
|
||||||
"Cybersecurity risk assessment frameworks",
|
|
||||||
"Incident response and business continuity resources"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"How should the NIST Framework be implemented in financial services?",
|
|
||||||
"What are the key controls required by ISO 27001?",
|
|
||||||
"How should cybersecurity risks be assessed and prioritized?",
|
|
||||||
"What incident response procedures are required?",
|
|
||||||
"How can employee security awareness be improved?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Framework implementation roadmap and priorities",
|
|
||||||
"Security control selection and implementation",
|
|
||||||
"Risk assessment methodology and tools",
|
|
||||||
"Incident response and recovery procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Employee training and awareness strategies"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "12-retail-ecommerce",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Retail E-commerce - Digital Marketing & Customer Experience",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Retail/E-commerce",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Digital Marketing Manager",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research digital marketing strategies and customer experience optimization for online retail",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "ecommerce-marketing-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're managing digital marketing for a growing e-commerce retailer specializing in sustainable home goods. You need to research modern digital marketing techniques, customer experience optimization, and data privacy compliance to increase sales and improve customer satisfaction.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"Digital marketing best practices and case studies",
|
|
||||||
"E-commerce conversion optimization techniques",
|
|
||||||
"Customer experience design and journey mapping",
|
|
||||||
"Data privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA) for e-commerce",
|
|
||||||
"Social media marketing and influencer strategies"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"Digital marketing industry publications and guides",
|
|
||||||
"E-commerce platform documentation and best practices",
|
|
||||||
"Customer experience research organizations",
|
|
||||||
"Data privacy and compliance resources",
|
|
||||||
"Social media marketing and advertising platforms"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the most effective customer acquisition strategies for e-commerce?",
|
|
||||||
"How can website conversion rates be optimized?",
|
|
||||||
"What data privacy compliance is required for customer data?",
|
|
||||||
"How should customer journey mapping be conducted?",
|
|
||||||
"What social media strategies work best for sustainable products?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Digital marketing strategy and channel optimization",
|
|
||||||
"Website conversion optimization techniques",
|
|
||||||
"Customer experience improvement recommendations",
|
|
||||||
"Data privacy compliance requirements and procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Social media and content marketing strategies"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "13-hospitality-operations",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Hospitality - Hotel Operations & Guest Experience Management",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Hospitality/Tourism",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Hotel Operations Manager",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research hotel operations best practices and guest experience optimization strategies",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "hotel-operations-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're managing operations for a boutique hotel chain focusing on sustainable tourism. You need to research modern hotel management practices, guest experience optimization, sustainability initiatives, and staff training programs to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"Hotel operations management best practices",
|
|
||||||
"Guest experience optimization and service design",
|
|
||||||
"Sustainable hospitality practices and certifications",
|
|
||||||
"Staff training and development programs",
|
|
||||||
"Revenue management and pricing strategies"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"Hospitality industry associations and publications",
|
|
||||||
"Hotel management training resources",
|
|
||||||
"Sustainable tourism certification organizations",
|
|
||||||
"Guest experience and service design resources",
|
|
||||||
"Revenue management and hospitality technology guides"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the key performance indicators for hotel operations?",
|
|
||||||
"How can guest satisfaction scores be improved?",
|
|
||||||
"What sustainable practices can reduce operational costs?",
|
|
||||||
"How should staff training programs be structured?",
|
|
||||||
"What revenue management strategies maximize profitability?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Operational efficiency metrics and improvement strategies",
|
|
||||||
"Guest experience enhancement recommendations",
|
|
||||||
"Sustainability initiatives and certification requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Staff development and training program design",
|
|
||||||
"Revenue optimization and pricing strategies"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "14-software-development",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Software Development - API Design & Documentation Best Practices",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Software Development/Tech",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Technical Lead",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research API design patterns and documentation strategies for microservices architecture",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "api-design-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're leading the development of a microservices platform for a SaaS company. You need to research REST API design best practices, OpenAPI documentation standards, authentication patterns, and testing strategies to ensure scalable and maintainable system architecture.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"REST API design principles and best practices",
|
|
||||||
"OpenAPI specification and documentation standards",
|
|
||||||
"API authentication and security patterns",
|
|
||||||
"Microservices architecture design guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"API testing and monitoring strategies"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"API design and development best practices guides",
|
|
||||||
"OpenAPI and Swagger documentation resources",
|
|
||||||
"Microservices architecture patterns and case studies",
|
|
||||||
"API security and authentication frameworks",
|
|
||||||
"Software testing and quality assurance resources"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the REST API design principles for scalable systems?",
|
|
||||||
"How should API documentation be structured using OpenAPI?",
|
|
||||||
"What authentication patterns work best for microservices?",
|
|
||||||
"How should API versioning be managed?",
|
|
||||||
"What testing strategies ensure API reliability?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"API design patterns and architectural principles",
|
|
||||||
"Documentation standards and tooling recommendations",
|
|
||||||
"Security and authentication implementation strategies",
|
|
||||||
"Version management and backward compatibility",
|
|
||||||
"Testing and monitoring framework recommendations"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "15-environmental-consulting",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Environmental Consulting - Impact Assessment & Remediation Planning",
|
|
||||||
"industry": "Environmental Consulting",
|
|
||||||
"role": "Environmental Scientist",
|
|
||||||
"task": "Research environmental impact assessment methodologies and soil contamination remediation techniques",
|
|
||||||
"folder": "environmental-assessment-research",
|
|
||||||
"description": "You're an environmental scientist working on a contaminated industrial site remediation project. You need to research environmental impact assessment procedures, soil contamination analysis methods, and remediation technologies to develop a comprehensive cleanup plan.",
|
|
||||||
"materials": [
|
|
||||||
"Environmental impact assessment (EIA) guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"Soil contamination testing and analysis procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Remediation technology options and case studies",
|
|
||||||
"EPA regulations for contaminated site cleanup",
|
|
||||||
"Groundwater monitoring and protection strategies"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"sources": [
|
|
||||||
"EPA environmental assessment and remediation guidelines",
|
|
||||||
"Environmental consulting industry standards",
|
|
||||||
"Soil science and remediation technology research",
|
|
||||||
"Groundwater protection and monitoring resources",
|
|
||||||
"Environmental impact assessment methodologies"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"questions": [
|
|
||||||
"What are the standard procedures for environmental impact assessment?",
|
|
||||||
"How should soil contamination be analyzed and categorized?",
|
|
||||||
"What remediation technologies are most effective for industrial contamination?",
|
|
||||||
"What monitoring is required during and after remediation?",
|
|
||||||
"How should community stakeholders be engaged in the process?"
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"findings": [
|
|
||||||
"Environmental impact assessment framework and procedures",
|
|
||||||
"Soil contamination analysis and risk assessment methods",
|
|
||||||
"Remediation technology selection and implementation",
|
|
||||||
"Monitoring and compliance requirements",
|
|
||||||
"Stakeholder engagement and communication strategies"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def generate_scenario_files(scenario):
|
|
||||||
"""Generate instruction and results files for a scenario"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Create scenario directory
|
|
||||||
scenario_dir = Path(f"agent-user-testing/{scenario['id']}")
|
|
||||||
scenario_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Generate instructions file
|
|
||||||
instructions_content = f"""# Test Scenario {scenario['id'].split('-')[0].zfill(2)}: {scenario['title']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🏢 **Industry Context**: {scenario['industry']}
|
|
||||||
**Role**: {scenario['role']}
|
|
||||||
**Task**: {scenario['task']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📋 **Scenario Description**
|
|
||||||
{scenario['description']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 **Your Mission (Completely Autonomous)**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 1: Setup FSS-Mini-RAG**
|
|
||||||
1. Read the repository README.md to understand how to install FSS-Mini-RAG
|
|
||||||
2. Follow the installation instructions for your platform
|
|
||||||
3. Verify the installation works by running `rag-mini --help`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 2: Gather Research Materials**
|
|
||||||
Create a folder called `{scenario['folder']}` and populate it with relevant documentation:"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for material in scenario['materials']:
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"\n- {material}"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sources to explore**:"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for source in scenario['sources']:
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"\n- {source}"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 3: Index and Search**
|
|
||||||
1. Use FSS-Mini-RAG to index your `{scenario['folder']}` folder
|
|
||||||
2. Perform searches to answer these questions:"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for question in scenario['questions']:
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"\n - \"{question}\""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 4: Document Your Findings**
|
|
||||||
Write your findings in `RESULTS.md` including:"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for finding in scenario['findings']:
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"\n- {finding}"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
instructions_content += f"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Step 5: Evaluation**
|
|
||||||
Rate FSS-Mini-RAG's effectiveness for:
|
|
||||||
- Finding specific information across multiple documents
|
|
||||||
- Searching complex documentation efficiently
|
|
||||||
- Helping with research and analysis workflows
|
|
||||||
- Overall usefulness for {scenario['industry'].lower()} industry applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📁 **Deliverables**
|
|
||||||
- `{scenario['folder']}/` folder with research materials
|
|
||||||
- `RESULTS.md` with findings and FSS-Mini-RAG evaluation
|
|
||||||
- Documentation of your search queries and discoveries
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ⏱️ **Expected Duration**: 2-3 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎓 **Learning Objectives**
|
|
||||||
- Test FSS-Mini-RAG with {scenario['industry'].lower()} industry content
|
|
||||||
- Evaluate search effectiveness with domain-specific documentation
|
|
||||||
- Assess usefulness for professional research workflows in {scenario['industry'].lower()}"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Write instructions file
|
|
||||||
with open(scenario_dir / "INSTRUCTIONS.md", 'w') as f:
|
|
||||||
f.write(instructions_content)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Generate results placeholder
|
|
||||||
results_content = f"""# Results Placeholder - {scenario['title']}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Agent will document findings here after completing the research task*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Research Findings
|
|
||||||
*To be completed by agent*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FSS-Mini-RAG Evaluation
|
|
||||||
*Agent evaluation of tool effectiveness for {scenario['industry'].lower()} workflows*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Search Queries Used
|
|
||||||
*Document the specific searches performed*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Professional Recommendations
|
|
||||||
*Agent recommendations for {scenario['industry'].lower()} industry applications*"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Write results file
|
|
||||||
with open(scenario_dir / "RESULTS.md", 'w') as f:
|
|
||||||
f.write(results_content)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def main():
|
|
||||||
print("Generating agent user testing scenarios...")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for scenario in scenarios:
|
|
||||||
print(f"Creating scenario: {scenario['id']}")
|
|
||||||
generate_scenario_files(scenario)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print(f"Successfully generated {len(scenarios)} test scenarios!")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
||||||
main()
|
|
||||||
@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
Validate that all agent user testing scenarios are properly structured
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import os
|
|
||||||
from pathlib import Path
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def validate_scenarios():
|
|
||||||
"""Validate all scenario directories"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
base_dir = Path("agent-user-testing")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print("🔍 Validating Agent User Testing Scenarios")
|
|
||||||
print("=" * 50)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
expected_scenarios = [
|
|
||||||
"01-mechanical-engineering",
|
|
||||||
"02-childcare-regulations",
|
|
||||||
"03-plant-logistics",
|
|
||||||
"04-financial-compliance",
|
|
||||||
"05-medical-research",
|
|
||||||
"06-real-estate-development",
|
|
||||||
"07-agriculture-sustainability",
|
|
||||||
"08-education-technology",
|
|
||||||
"09-construction-safety",
|
|
||||||
"10-nonprofit-fundraising",
|
|
||||||
"11-cybersecurity-compliance",
|
|
||||||
"12-retail-ecommerce",
|
|
||||||
"13-hospitality-operations",
|
|
||||||
"14-software-development",
|
|
||||||
"15-environmental-consulting"
|
|
||||||
]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
all_valid = True
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for scenario in expected_scenarios:
|
|
||||||
scenario_dir = base_dir / scenario
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print(f"\n📁 Checking {scenario}:")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Check if directory exists
|
|
||||||
if not scenario_dir.exists():
|
|
||||||
print(f" ❌ Directory missing")
|
|
||||||
all_valid = False
|
|
||||||
continue
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Check for required files
|
|
||||||
instructions_file = scenario_dir / "INSTRUCTIONS.md"
|
|
||||||
results_file = scenario_dir / "RESULTS.md"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if instructions_file.exists():
|
|
||||||
print(f" ✅ INSTRUCTIONS.md present")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Quick content validation
|
|
||||||
content = instructions_file.read_text()
|
|
||||||
if "FSS-Mini-RAG" in content and "Step 1: Setup" in content:
|
|
||||||
print(f" ✅ Instructions contain required elements")
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
print(f" ⚠️ Instructions missing key elements")
|
|
||||||
all_valid = False
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
print(f" ❌ INSTRUCTIONS.md missing")
|
|
||||||
all_valid = False
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if results_file.exists():
|
|
||||||
print(f" ✅ RESULTS.md present")
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
print(f" ❌ RESULTS.md missing")
|
|
||||||
all_valid = False
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print(f"\n{'=' * 50}")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if all_valid:
|
|
||||||
print(f"✅ ALL SCENARIOS VALID ({len(expected_scenarios)} scenarios)")
|
|
||||||
print(f"🚀 Ready for agent deployment!")
|
|
||||||
print(f"\nNext steps:")
|
|
||||||
print(f"1. Choose scenarios for testing priority")
|
|
||||||
print(f"2. Assign appropriate agent types")
|
|
||||||
print(f"3. Deploy agents with scenario instructions")
|
|
||||||
print(f"4. Monitor results and gather feedback")
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
print(f"⚠️ SOME SCENARIOS NEED ATTENTION")
|
|
||||||
print(f"🔧 Fix issues before deployment")
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return all_valid
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
||||||
validate_scenarios()
|
|
||||||
@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"agent_id": "03",
|
|
||||||
"domain": "plant-logistics",
|
|
||||||
"start_time": "$(date -Iseconds)",
|
|
||||||
"current_phase": "GIT",
|
|
||||||
"phases_completed": [],
|
|
||||||
"progress_percentage": 95,
|
|
||||||
"documents_indexed": 0,
|
|
||||||
"searches_completed": 0,
|
|
||||||
"searches_total": 5,
|
|
||||||
"issues_created": 0,
|
|
||||||
"overall_rating": null,
|
|
||||||
"status": "in_progress",
|
|
||||||
"last_update": "2025-09-08T15:57:12+00:00",
|
|
||||||
"errors": []
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
#!/bin/bash
|
|
||||||
AGENT_ID="03"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
log_message() {
|
|
||||||
local level=$1
|
|
||||||
local phase=$2
|
|
||||||
local message=$3
|
|
||||||
echo "[$(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')] [AGENT-${AGENT_ID}] [$phase] [$level] $message" >> logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_session.log
|
|
||||||
echo "[$(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')] [$phase] [$level] $message"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if [ "$level" = "ERROR" ]; then
|
|
||||||
echo "[$(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')] [AGENT-${AGENT_ID}] [$phase] $message" >> logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_errors.log
|
|
||||||
fi
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
update_progress() {
|
|
||||||
local phase=$1
|
|
||||||
local percentage=$2
|
|
||||||
jq --arg phase "$phase" --arg pct "$percentage" --arg time "$(date -Iseconds)" \
|
|
||||||
'.current_phase = $phase | .progress_percentage = ($pct | tonumber) | .last_update = $time' \
|
|
||||||
logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.json > logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.tmp && \
|
|
||||||
mv logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.tmp logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.json
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
log_gitea() {
|
|
||||||
local operation=$1
|
|
||||||
local details=$2
|
|
||||||
echo "[$(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')] [AGENT-${AGENT_ID}] [GITEA] $operation: $details" >> logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_gitea.log
|
|
||||||
log_message "INFO" "GITEA" "$operation: $details"
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mark_complete() {
|
|
||||||
local rating=$1
|
|
||||||
jq --arg time "$(date -Iseconds)" --arg rating "$rating" \
|
|
||||||
'.status = "completed" | .progress_percentage = 100 | .current_phase = "COMPLETE" | .overall_rating = ($rating | tonumber) | .last_update = $time' \
|
|
||||||
logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.json > logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.tmp && \
|
|
||||||
mv logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.tmp logs/agent_${AGENT_ID}_progress.json
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
@ -1,155 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Inventory Management Systems for Manufacturing Plants
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Just-In-Time (JIT) Inventory Management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Core Principles
|
|
||||||
- **Demand-Pull System**: Production triggered by actual customer demand
|
|
||||||
- **Zero Inventory Goal**: Minimize work-in-process and finished goods
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Integration**: Close partnerships for reliable, frequent deliveries
|
|
||||||
- **Quality Focus**: Defect-free materials to prevent production disruptions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Implementation Requirements
|
|
||||||
- **Reliable Suppliers**: Certified vendors with consistent quality
|
|
||||||
- **Stable Production Schedule**: Level production to enable predictable material flows
|
|
||||||
- **Short Setup Times**: Quick changeovers to support small batch production
|
|
||||||
- **Preventive Maintenance**: Equipment reliability to maintain flow
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### JIT Benefits for Manufacturing
|
|
||||||
- **Reduced Carrying Costs**: 50-80% reduction in inventory investment
|
|
||||||
- **Improved Cash Flow**: Faster inventory turns and reduced working capital
|
|
||||||
- **Enhanced Quality**: Immediate detection of defects
|
|
||||||
- **Space Optimization**: More floor space available for production
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Kanban System Implementation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Visual Management Principles
|
|
||||||
- **Signal Cards**: Physical or electronic signals for replenishment
|
|
||||||
- **Two-Bin System**: One in use, one in reserve/replenishment
|
|
||||||
- **Pull Authorization**: Material moved only when signaled
|
|
||||||
- **Continuous Flow**: Smooth material movement through production
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Kanban Calculation Formula
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
Number of Kanbans = (Demand during Lead Time + Safety Stock) / Container Quantity
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Where:
|
|
||||||
- Demand during Lead Time = Daily Demand × Lead Time (days)
|
|
||||||
- Safety Stock = Buffer for demand/supply variability
|
|
||||||
- Container Quantity = Standard batch size
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Types of Kanban Systems
|
|
||||||
1. **Production Kanban**: Authorizes production of specific quantities
|
|
||||||
2. **Withdrawal Kanban**: Authorizes movement of materials
|
|
||||||
3. **Supplier Kanban**: Signals external supplier for replenishment
|
|
||||||
4. **Express Kanban**: Emergency replenishment for critical shortages
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Advanced Inventory Management Techniques
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### ABC-XYZ Analysis
|
|
||||||
- **ABC Classification**: Value-based (A=high value, B=medium, C=low)
|
|
||||||
- **XYZ Classification**: Demand variability (X=stable, Y=variable, Z=irregular)
|
|
||||||
- **Strategic Matrix**: 9-category classification for tailored management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Demand Forecasting Methods
|
|
||||||
- **Moving Averages**: Simple smoothing for stable demand
|
|
||||||
- **Exponential Smoothing**: Weighted recent data for trending demand
|
|
||||||
- **Seasonal Decomposition**: Account for cyclical patterns
|
|
||||||
- **Machine Learning**: AI-driven forecasting for complex patterns
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Safety Stock Optimization
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
Safety Stock = Z-score × √(Lead Time) × Standard Deviation of Demand
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Where:
|
|
||||||
- Z-score = Service level factor (1.65 for 95% service level)
|
|
||||||
- Lead Time = Supplier lead time in days
|
|
||||||
- Standard Deviation = Historical demand variability
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Warehouse Management Systems (WMS) Integration
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Core WMS Functionalities
|
|
||||||
- **Real-time Inventory Tracking**: RFID and barcode integration
|
|
||||||
- **Dynamic Slotting**: Optimize storage locations based on velocity
|
|
||||||
- **Wave Planning**: Batch orders for efficient picking
|
|
||||||
- **Labor Management**: Track productivity and optimize assignments
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Manufacturing-Specific Features
|
|
||||||
- **Bill of Materials (BOM) Integration**: Track component requirements
|
|
||||||
- **Work Order Management**: Link inventory to production schedules
|
|
||||||
- **Quality Control**: Lot tracking and recall capabilities
|
|
||||||
- **Cycle Counting**: Continuous inventory accuracy programs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Key Performance Indicators
|
|
||||||
- **Inventory Accuracy**: Target >99.5% accuracy
|
|
||||||
- **Order Fill Rate**: Percentage of complete orders shipped on time
|
|
||||||
- **Inventory Turns**: Annual cost of goods sold / average inventory value
|
|
||||||
- **Carrying Cost**: Percentage of inventory value (target <25%)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Supply Chain Risk Management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Risk Categories
|
|
||||||
1. **Supplier Risks**: Single source dependencies, financial instability
|
|
||||||
2. **Demand Risks**: Forecast variability, market changes
|
|
||||||
3. **Operational Risks**: Equipment failures, quality issues
|
|
||||||
4. **External Risks**: Natural disasters, geopolitical events
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Mitigation Strategies
|
|
||||||
- **Dual Sourcing**: Multiple suppliers for critical components
|
|
||||||
- **Safety Stock**: Buffer inventory for high-risk items
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Development**: Improve supplier capabilities and reliability
|
|
||||||
- **Demand Sensing**: Real-time demand visibility and response
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Technology Solutions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### IoT and Industry 4.0
|
|
||||||
- **Smart Sensors**: Real-time monitoring of inventory levels
|
|
||||||
- **Predictive Analytics**: Anticipate demand patterns and supply issues
|
|
||||||
- **Automated Replenishment**: Trigger orders based on consumption
|
|
||||||
- **Digital Twin**: Virtual representation of physical inventory
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Artificial Intelligence Applications
|
|
||||||
- **Demand Forecasting**: ML algorithms for complex demand patterns
|
|
||||||
- **Optimization**: AI-driven inventory level optimization
|
|
||||||
- **Anomaly Detection**: Identify unusual patterns in consumption
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Selection**: AI-assisted vendor evaluation and selection
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Case Study: Automotive Parts Manufacturing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Company Profile
|
|
||||||
- **Size**: 500 employees, $100M annual revenue
|
|
||||||
- **Challenge**: High inventory costs and stockouts
|
|
||||||
- **Industry**: Tier-1 automotive supplier
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Solution Implementation
|
|
||||||
1. **JIT Implementation**: Reduced raw material inventory by 60%
|
|
||||||
2. **Kanban Systems**: Visual management for production floor
|
|
||||||
3. **WMS Integration**: Real-time visibility and control
|
|
||||||
4. **Supplier Partnership**: Weekly deliveries from key suppliers
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Results Achieved
|
|
||||||
- **Inventory Reduction**: 45% decrease in total inventory investment
|
|
||||||
- **Service Level**: 99.2% on-time delivery to customers
|
|
||||||
- **Cost Savings**: $2.5M annual reduction in carrying costs
|
|
||||||
- **Space Utilization**: 30% more floor space for production
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Implementation Best Practices
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Change Management
|
|
||||||
1. **Leadership Commitment**: Executive sponsorship and resources
|
|
||||||
2. **Cross-functional Team**: Representatives from all affected departments
|
|
||||||
3. **Training Program**: Comprehensive education on new processes
|
|
||||||
4. **Pilot Implementation**: Start with high-impact, low-risk areas
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Success Factors
|
|
||||||
- **Data Accuracy**: Clean, reliable data for system effectiveness
|
|
||||||
- **Process Standardization**: Consistent procedures across operations
|
|
||||||
- **Continuous Improvement**: Regular review and optimization
|
|
||||||
- **Technology Integration**: Seamless connection between systems
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Common Pitfalls to Avoid
|
|
||||||
- **Insufficient Training**: Inadequate preparation of staff
|
|
||||||
- **Poor Data Quality**: Inaccurate inventory records
|
|
||||||
- **Lack of Discipline**: Inconsistent adherence to procedures
|
|
||||||
- **Technology Over-reliance**: Ignoring process fundamentals
|
|
||||||
@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma in Logistics
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Lean Principles for Logistics Operations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### 1. Value Stream Mapping
|
|
||||||
- **Identify Value-Added Activities**: Focus on customer-centric processes
|
|
||||||
- **Eliminate Waste (Muda)**: Remove non-value-added steps
|
|
||||||
- **Continuous Flow**: Minimize work-in-process inventory
|
|
||||||
- **Pull Systems**: Demand-driven material movement
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### 2. Just-In-Time (JIT) Implementation
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Integration**: Close partnerships for reliable delivery
|
|
||||||
- **Kanban Systems**: Visual signals for material replenishment
|
|
||||||
- **Reduced Lot Sizes**: Minimize inventory carrying costs
|
|
||||||
- **Quality at Source**: Prevent defects from entering the system
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### 3. 5S Methodology for Warehouse Operations
|
|
||||||
- **Seiri (Sort)**: Remove unnecessary items from work areas
|
|
||||||
- **Seiton (Set in Order)**: Organize tools and materials logically
|
|
||||||
- **Seiso (Shine)**: Maintain clean and orderly workspace
|
|
||||||
- **Seiketsu (Standardize)**: Create consistent procedures
|
|
||||||
- **Shitsuke (Sustain)**: Maintain improvements through discipline
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Six Sigma DMAIC for Logistics
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Define Phase
|
|
||||||
- **Problem Statement**: Clearly identify logistics inefficiencies
|
|
||||||
- **Project Charter**: Scope, timeline, and success metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Voice of Customer**: Internal and external customer requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Measure Phase
|
|
||||||
- **Current State Metrics**: Baseline performance data
|
|
||||||
- **Data Collection Plan**: Systematic measurement approach
|
|
||||||
- **Process Capability**: Statistical analysis of current performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Analyze Phase
|
|
||||||
- **Root Cause Analysis**: Fishbone diagrams and 5-Why analysis
|
|
||||||
- **Statistical Analysis**: Correlation and regression studies
|
|
||||||
- **Value Stream Analysis**: Identify bottlenecks and constraints
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Improve Phase
|
|
||||||
- **Solution Generation**: Brainstorming and pilot testing
|
|
||||||
- **Design of Experiments**: Optimize process parameters
|
|
||||||
- **Implementation Plan**: Phased rollout strategy
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Control Phase
|
|
||||||
- **Control Plans**: Monitoring systems and procedures
|
|
||||||
- **Statistical Process Control**: Charts and control limits
|
|
||||||
- **Standardization**: Document best practices
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Logistics-Specific Lean Tools
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Kanban for Material Flow
|
|
||||||
- **Production Kanban**: Authorize production quantities
|
|
||||||
- **Transport Kanban**: Signal material movement needs
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Kanban**: Direct supplier replenishment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Milk Run Systems
|
|
||||||
- **Route Optimization**: Consolidate multiple supplier pickups
|
|
||||||
- **Frequency Planning**: Balance inventory and transportation costs
|
|
||||||
- **Cross-Docking Integration**: Seamless flow from suppliers to production
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Cellular Layout Design
|
|
||||||
- **Product Families**: Group similar manufacturing processes
|
|
||||||
- **Reduced Material Handling**: Minimize transport distances
|
|
||||||
- **Team-Based Operations**: Self-contained work cells
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Manufacturing Plant Case Studies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 1: Automotive Component Manufacturer
|
|
||||||
- **Challenge**: Excess inventory and long lead times
|
|
||||||
- **Solution**: JIT implementation with key suppliers
|
|
||||||
- **Results**:
|
|
||||||
- 40% reduction in inventory carrying costs
|
|
||||||
- 25% improvement in on-time delivery
|
|
||||||
- 15% reduction in overall logistics costs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 2: Electronics Assembly Plant
|
|
||||||
- **Challenge**: High material handling costs and errors
|
|
||||||
- **Solution**: 5S implementation and visual management
|
|
||||||
- **Results**:
|
|
||||||
- 30% reduction in picking errors
|
|
||||||
- 20% improvement in material handler productivity
|
|
||||||
- 50% reduction in time spent searching for materials
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Performance Indicators
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Lean Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Inventory Turns**: Target 12+ turns per year
|
|
||||||
- **Lead Time**: Measure and continuously reduce
|
|
||||||
- **First Pass Yield**: Quality metric for logistics processes
|
|
||||||
- **Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)**: For material handling equipment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Cost Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Cost per Unit Handled**: Benchmark against industry standards
|
|
||||||
- **Labor Productivity**: Units processed per labor hour
|
|
||||||
- **Space Utilization**: Maximize warehouse cubic utilization
|
|
||||||
- **Transportation Cost**: Per unit and as percentage of sales
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Implementation Roadmap
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. **Executive Commitment**: Secure leadership support and resources
|
|
||||||
2. **Team Training**: Develop lean and Six Sigma capabilities
|
|
||||||
3. **Pilot Projects**: Start with high-impact, low-risk areas
|
|
||||||
4. **Expansion Strategy**: Scale successful pilots across operations
|
|
||||||
5. **Continuous Improvement Culture**: Embed lean thinking in daily operations
|
|
||||||
@ -1,224 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Supply Chain Risk Management and Resilience Strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Understanding Supply Chain Risks
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Risk Categories and Sources
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Supplier-Related Risks
|
|
||||||
- **Single Source Dependencies**: Over-reliance on one supplier
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Financial Instability**: Bankruptcy or cash flow issues
|
|
||||||
- **Quality Issues**: Defective materials affecting production
|
|
||||||
- **Capacity Constraints**: Supplier inability to meet demand spikes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Operational Risks
|
|
||||||
- **Equipment Failures**: Production line breakdowns
|
|
||||||
- **Inventory Shortages**: Stockouts disrupting manufacturing
|
|
||||||
- **Transportation Disruptions**: Delays in material delivery
|
|
||||||
- **Facility Damage**: Fire, flood, or other disasters
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### External Environmental Risks
|
|
||||||
- **Natural Disasters**: Earthquakes, hurricanes, floods
|
|
||||||
- **Geopolitical Events**: Trade wars, sanctions, political instability
|
|
||||||
- **Economic Fluctuations**: Currency changes, inflation, recession
|
|
||||||
- **Regulatory Changes**: New compliance requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Demand-Side Risks
|
|
||||||
- **Forecast Variability**: Inaccurate demand predictions
|
|
||||||
- **Market Volatility**: Sudden demand changes
|
|
||||||
- **Customer Concentration**: Over-dependence on few customers
|
|
||||||
- **Product Lifecycle Changes**: Technology obsolescence
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Risk Assessment and Prioritization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Risk Matrix Framework
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
Risk Level = Probability × Impact
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Where:
|
|
||||||
- Probability: Likelihood of occurrence (1-5 scale)
|
|
||||||
- Impact: Severity of consequences (1-5 scale)
|
|
||||||
- Risk Levels: 1-8 (Low), 9-15 (Medium), 16-25 (High)
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Business Impact Analysis
|
|
||||||
- **Financial Impact**: Cost of disruption per day/week
|
|
||||||
- **Customer Impact**: Service level degradation
|
|
||||||
- **Operational Impact**: Production capacity loss
|
|
||||||
- **Reputation Impact**: Brand damage and market position
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Risk Scoring Methodology
|
|
||||||
1. **Identify Threats**: Comprehensive risk catalog
|
|
||||||
2. **Assess Probability**: Historical data and expert judgment
|
|
||||||
3. **Evaluate Impact**: Quantify financial and operational consequences
|
|
||||||
4. **Calculate Risk Score**: Probability × Impact matrix
|
|
||||||
5. **Prioritize Actions**: Focus on high-risk, high-impact scenarios
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Risk Mitigation Strategies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Supplier Risk Mitigation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Diversification Strategies
|
|
||||||
- **Multi-Sourcing**: Minimum 2-3 suppliers for critical components
|
|
||||||
- **Geographic Distribution**: Suppliers across different regions
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Development**: Build capabilities in backup suppliers
|
|
||||||
- **Strategic Partnerships**: Long-term contracts with key suppliers
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Supplier Monitoring and Assessment
|
|
||||||
- **Financial Health Monitoring**: Regular credit checks and financial analysis
|
|
||||||
- **Performance Scorecards**: Quality, delivery, and cost metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Site Audits**: Regular facility and capability assessments
|
|
||||||
- **Risk Questionnaires**: Supplier self-assessment of risks
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Inventory Risk Mitigation
|
|
||||||
- **Strategic Safety Stock**: Buffer inventory for critical components
|
|
||||||
- **ABC Analysis**: Prioritize inventory investment by criticality
|
|
||||||
- **Forward Buying**: Purchase ahead of anticipated disruptions
|
|
||||||
- **Consignment Inventory**: Supplier-owned inventory at customer site
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Operational Risk Mitigation
|
|
||||||
- **Redundant Capacity**: Backup equipment and production lines
|
|
||||||
- **Cross-Training**: Multi-skilled workforce for flexibility
|
|
||||||
- **Preventive Maintenance**: Reduce equipment failure probability
|
|
||||||
- **Business Continuity Plans**: Detailed response procedures
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Building Supply Chain Resilience
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Resilience Principles
|
|
||||||
1. **Redundancy**: Multiple pathways and backup options
|
|
||||||
2. **Flexibility**: Ability to adapt to changing conditions
|
|
||||||
3. **Visibility**: End-to-end supply chain transparency
|
|
||||||
4. **Collaboration**: Strong partnerships and information sharing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Design for Resilience
|
|
||||||
- **Network Design**: Balanced centralization and decentralization
|
|
||||||
- **Capacity Planning**: Built-in flexibility for demand variation
|
|
||||||
- **Technology Integration**: Real-time visibility and control
|
|
||||||
- **Scenario Planning**: Prepare for multiple disruption scenarios
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Early Warning Systems
|
|
||||||
- **Supply Chain Control Tower**: Centralized monitoring and coordination
|
|
||||||
- **Key Performance Indicators**: Real-time metrics and alerts
|
|
||||||
- **Predictive Analytics**: Anticipate potential disruptions
|
|
||||||
- **External Intelligence**: Monitor global events and trends
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Technology Solutions for Risk Management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Digital Supply Chain Technologies
|
|
||||||
- **IoT Sensors**: Real-time monitoring of shipments and inventory
|
|
||||||
- **Blockchain**: Transparent and secure supply chain records
|
|
||||||
- **AI/ML Analytics**: Pattern recognition and predictive modeling
|
|
||||||
- **Cloud Platforms**: Scalable data processing and collaboration
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Supply Chain Visibility Tools
|
|
||||||
- **Track and Trace**: Real-time shipment monitoring
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Portals**: Collaborative planning and communication
|
|
||||||
- **Control Towers**: Centralized command and control
|
|
||||||
- **Risk Dashboards**: Visual representation of supply chain health
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Advanced Analytics Applications
|
|
||||||
- **Network Optimization**: Design resilient supply chain networks
|
|
||||||
- **Scenario Modeling**: Test response strategies
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Risk Scoring**: Automated supplier risk assessment
|
|
||||||
- **Demand Sensing**: Early detection of demand changes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Crisis Management and Response
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Crisis Response Framework
|
|
||||||
1. **Detection**: Early identification of disruptions
|
|
||||||
2. **Assessment**: Evaluate impact and response options
|
|
||||||
3. **Response**: Implement contingency plans
|
|
||||||
4. **Recovery**: Restore normal operations
|
|
||||||
5. **Learning**: Capture lessons and improve plans
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Communication Protocols
|
|
||||||
- **Internal Communication**: Clear roles and escalation procedures
|
|
||||||
- **Customer Communication**: Proactive updates and alternatives
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Communication**: Collaborative problem-solving
|
|
||||||
- **Stakeholder Updates**: Regular status reports
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Recovery Strategies
|
|
||||||
- **Alternative Sourcing**: Activate backup suppliers
|
|
||||||
- **Expedited Transportation**: Air freight or express delivery
|
|
||||||
- **Production Rescheduling**: Prioritize critical orders
|
|
||||||
- **Customer Allocation**: Fair distribution of limited supply
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Case Studies in Supply Chain Resilience
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 1: Automotive Manufacturer
|
|
||||||
**Challenge**: Semiconductor chip shortage disrupting production
|
|
||||||
**Response Strategy**:
|
|
||||||
- Diversified supplier base across regions
|
|
||||||
- Increased safety stock for critical components
|
|
||||||
- Redesigned products to use alternative chips
|
|
||||||
**Results**: Maintained 85% production capacity vs. 60% industry average
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 2: Medical Device Company
|
|
||||||
**Challenge**: COVID-19 disrupting global supply chains
|
|
||||||
**Response Strategy**:
|
|
||||||
- Nearshoring critical suppliers
|
|
||||||
- Vertical integration of key components
|
|
||||||
- Digital supply chain visibility platform
|
|
||||||
**Results**: Zero production interruptions during pandemic
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 3: Electronics Manufacturer
|
|
||||||
**Challenge**: Natural disaster affecting key supplier facility
|
|
||||||
**Response Strategy**:
|
|
||||||
- Pre-positioned emergency inventory
|
|
||||||
- Rapid qualification of alternative suppliers
|
|
||||||
- Flexible transportation network
|
|
||||||
**Results**: Resumed full production within 72 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Performance Indicators for Risk Management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Risk Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Risk Score**: Weighted assessment of supplier risks
|
|
||||||
- **Supply Chain Disruption Frequency**: Number of events per year
|
|
||||||
- **Recovery Time**: Average time to restore normal operations
|
|
||||||
- **Cost of Disruption**: Financial impact per incident
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Resilience Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Supplier Diversification Index**: Measure of supplier concentration
|
|
||||||
- **Inventory Coverage**: Days of supply for critical components
|
|
||||||
- **Network Flexibility**: Ability to reroute through alternative paths
|
|
||||||
- **Response Time**: Speed of crisis response activation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Business Continuity Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Uptime Percentage**: Operational availability
|
|
||||||
- **Service Level Maintenance**: Customer service during disruptions
|
|
||||||
- **Financial Impact**: Revenue and margin protection
|
|
||||||
- **Stakeholder Satisfaction**: Customer and supplier feedback
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Implementation Roadmap
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Phase 1: Assessment (Months 1-3)
|
|
||||||
- Conduct comprehensive risk assessment
|
|
||||||
- Map critical suppliers and dependencies
|
|
||||||
- Establish baseline metrics and KPIs
|
|
||||||
- Develop risk register and scoring system
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Phase 2: Strategy Development (Months 4-6)
|
|
||||||
- Define risk tolerance and mitigation strategies
|
|
||||||
- Design resilient supply chain network
|
|
||||||
- Develop contingency and response plans
|
|
||||||
- Establish governance and decision-making processes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Phase 3: Implementation (Months 7-12)
|
|
||||||
- Execute supplier diversification strategy
|
|
||||||
- Implement monitoring and early warning systems
|
|
||||||
- Train teams on response procedures
|
|
||||||
- Establish communication protocols
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Phase 4: Continuous Improvement (Ongoing)
|
|
||||||
- Regular risk assessment updates
|
|
||||||
- Performance monitoring and optimization
|
|
||||||
- Scenario planning and stress testing
|
|
||||||
- Knowledge sharing and best practice development
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Best Practices Summary
|
|
||||||
1. **Proactive Risk Management**: Don't wait for disruptions to occur
|
|
||||||
2. **Cross-functional Collaboration**: Involve all stakeholders
|
|
||||||
3. **Regular Testing**: Validate plans through simulations
|
|
||||||
4. **Continuous Learning**: Update strategies based on experience
|
|
||||||
5. **Technology Investment**: Leverage digital tools for visibility
|
|
||||||
6. **Supplier Relationships**: Build strong partnerships
|
|
||||||
7. **Flexible Design**: Create adaptable systems and processes
|
|
||||||
@ -1,293 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Automation and Robotics in Warehouse Operations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Overview of Warehouse Automation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Automation Benefits
|
|
||||||
- **Increased Productivity**: 200-300% improvement in picking rates
|
|
||||||
- **Improved Accuracy**: Reduction in picking errors to <0.1%
|
|
||||||
- **Labor Cost Reduction**: 50-70% decrease in direct labor requirements
|
|
||||||
- **Enhanced Safety**: Reduced workplace injuries and ergonomic issues
|
|
||||||
- **Scalability**: Flexible capacity to handle demand fluctuations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Levels of Automation
|
|
||||||
1. **Basic Mechanization**: Conveyors and basic material handling
|
|
||||||
2. **Fixed Automation**: Automated storage and retrieval systems
|
|
||||||
3. **Flexible Automation**: Autonomous mobile robots and AGVs
|
|
||||||
4. **Intelligent Automation**: AI-powered systems with machine learning
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### System Types
|
|
||||||
- **Unit Load AS/RS**: Large pallets and containers
|
|
||||||
- **Mini-Load AS/RS**: Totes and small parts
|
|
||||||
- **Micro-Load AS/RS**: Individual items and components
|
|
||||||
- **Vertical Lift Modules (VLM)**: Space-efficient vertical storage
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Key Components
|
|
||||||
- **Storage Racks**: High-density storage structures
|
|
||||||
- **Stacker Cranes**: Automated retrieval mechanisms
|
|
||||||
- **Conveyor Systems**: Material transport infrastructure
|
|
||||||
- **Warehouse Control System (WCS)**: Orchestrates operations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Characteristics
|
|
||||||
- **Storage Density**: 2-5x improvement over conventional storage
|
|
||||||
- **Throughput**: 200-1000+ transactions per hour per crane
|
|
||||||
- **Accuracy**: >99.9% picking accuracy
|
|
||||||
- **ROI Timeline**: 3-5 years typical payback period
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Robotic Systems in Warehousing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)
|
|
||||||
**Capabilities**:
|
|
||||||
- Dynamic path planning and obstacle avoidance
|
|
||||||
- Collaborative operation with human workers
|
|
||||||
- Flexible deployment across multiple tasks
|
|
||||||
- Integration with warehouse management systems
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Applications**:
|
|
||||||
- Order picking assistance (goods-to-person)
|
|
||||||
- Inventory transportation between zones
|
|
||||||
- Cycle counting and inventory audits
|
|
||||||
- Cross-docking and sortation support
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Articulated Robotic Arms
|
|
||||||
**Use Cases**:
|
|
||||||
- Palletizing and depalletizing operations
|
|
||||||
- Case picking from mixed pallets
|
|
||||||
- Quality inspection and sorting
|
|
||||||
- Package handling and manipulation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Performance Metrics**:
|
|
||||||
- **Speed**: 500-1200 picks per hour
|
|
||||||
- **Payload**: 5-50 kg typical capacity
|
|
||||||
- **Accuracy**: Sub-millimeter positioning
|
|
||||||
- **Uptime**: >95% operational availability
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)
|
|
||||||
**Navigation Methods**:
|
|
||||||
- Magnetic tape and wire guidance
|
|
||||||
- Laser guidance systems
|
|
||||||
- Vision-based navigation
|
|
||||||
- Natural feature navigation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Applications**:
|
|
||||||
- Raw material delivery to production
|
|
||||||
- Finished goods transport to shipping
|
|
||||||
- Inter-facility material transfer
|
|
||||||
- Automated trailer loading/unloading
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Pick-to-Light and Voice Technologies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Pick-to-Light Systems
|
|
||||||
**Components**:
|
|
||||||
- LED displays at storage locations
|
|
||||||
- Quantity confirmation buttons
|
|
||||||
- Central control software
|
|
||||||
- Integration with WMS
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Benefits**:
|
|
||||||
- 25-50% improvement in picking speed
|
|
||||||
- Significant reduction in training time
|
|
||||||
- Multi-language support capability
|
|
||||||
- Real-time performance monitoring
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Voice-Directed Picking
|
|
||||||
**System Elements**:
|
|
||||||
- Voice recognition software
|
|
||||||
- Wireless headsets with microphones
|
|
||||||
- Speech synthesis for instructions
|
|
||||||
- Hands-free operation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Advantages**:
|
|
||||||
- Hands and eyes free for safe operation
|
|
||||||
- Improved picking accuracy (>99.5%)
|
|
||||||
- Reduced paper and printing costs
|
|
||||||
- Enhanced worker safety and ergonomics
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Conveyor and Sortation Systems
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Conveyor Technologies
|
|
||||||
- **Belt Conveyors**: Gentle handling for fragile items
|
|
||||||
- **Roller Conveyors**: Efficient for boxes and totes
|
|
||||||
- **Chain Conveyors**: Heavy-duty applications
|
|
||||||
- **Spiral Conveyors**: Vertical transportation in limited space
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Automated Sortation
|
|
||||||
**Sortation Methods**:
|
|
||||||
- **Cross-Belt Sorters**: High-speed, gentle handling
|
|
||||||
- **Tilt-Tray Sorters**: Versatile item handling
|
|
||||||
- **Sliding Shoe Sorters**: Precise diverting control
|
|
||||||
- **Bomb-Bay Sorters**: Gravity-fed discharge
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Performance Specifications**:
|
|
||||||
- **Throughput**: 5,000-30,000+ items per hour
|
|
||||||
- **Accuracy**: >99.95% sort accuracy
|
|
||||||
- **Destinations**: 100-500+ sort locations
|
|
||||||
- **Item Handling**: Wide range of sizes and weights
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Warehouse Control Systems (WCS)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### System Architecture
|
|
||||||
- **Real-time Control**: Millisecond response capabilities
|
|
||||||
- **Equipment Integration**: Universal equipment interfaces
|
|
||||||
- **Load Balancing**: Optimize system throughput
|
|
||||||
- **Fault Management**: Automatic error detection and recovery
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Key Functions
|
|
||||||
- **Task Optimization**: Sequence operations for maximum efficiency
|
|
||||||
- **Traffic Management**: Coordinate multiple automated systems
|
|
||||||
- **Performance Monitoring**: Real-time system analytics
|
|
||||||
- **Maintenance Scheduling**: Predictive maintenance alerts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Integration Capabilities
|
|
||||||
- **WMS Integration**: Seamless order and inventory management
|
|
||||||
- **ERP Connectivity**: Enterprise resource planning alignment
|
|
||||||
- **IoT Device Management**: Sensor data collection and analysis
|
|
||||||
- **API Standards**: RESTful and SOAP web services
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Implementation Considerations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Planning and Design
|
|
||||||
- **Throughput Analysis**: Determine capacity requirements
|
|
||||||
- **Layout Optimization**: Design for material flow efficiency
|
|
||||||
- **Scalability Planning**: Future expansion capabilities
|
|
||||||
- **Integration Strategy**: Existing system compatibility
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Technology Selection Criteria
|
|
||||||
- **Volume Requirements**: Peak and average throughput needs
|
|
||||||
- **SKU Characteristics**: Size, weight, and handling requirements
|
|
||||||
- **Budget Constraints**: Capital and operational cost limits
|
|
||||||
- **Implementation Timeline**: Project schedule requirements
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Change Management
|
|
||||||
- **Workforce Training**: Comprehensive automation education
|
|
||||||
- **Process Redesign**: Optimize workflows for automation
|
|
||||||
- **Performance Metrics**: Establish KPIs and monitoring
|
|
||||||
- **Continuous Improvement**: Regular system optimization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Case Studies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 1: E-commerce Fulfillment Center
|
|
||||||
**Challenge**: Handle 50,000 orders per day with 99.5% accuracy
|
|
||||||
**Solution**:
|
|
||||||
- Kiva robots (now Amazon Robotics) for picking
|
|
||||||
- Automated packaging systems
|
|
||||||
- Voice-directed quality control
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Results**:
|
|
||||||
- 300% increase in productivity
|
|
||||||
- 67% reduction in operating costs
|
|
||||||
- <24 hour order-to-shipment cycle time
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 2: Automotive Parts Distribution
|
|
||||||
**Challenge**: Manage 100,000+ SKUs with JIT delivery requirements
|
|
||||||
**Solution**:
|
|
||||||
- AS/RS for high-velocity parts
|
|
||||||
- AGV system for heavy components
|
|
||||||
- Pick-to-light for small parts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Results**:
|
|
||||||
- 99.8% order accuracy
|
|
||||||
- 40% reduction in labor costs
|
|
||||||
- 2.5x improvement in throughput
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Case Study 3: Pharmaceutical Distribution
|
|
||||||
**Challenge**: Ensure product integrity and regulatory compliance
|
|
||||||
**Solution**:
|
|
||||||
- Temperature-controlled AS/RS
|
|
||||||
- Vision-based quality inspection
|
|
||||||
- Track-and-trace capability
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Results**:
|
|
||||||
- 100% lot traceability
|
|
||||||
- Zero temperature excursions
|
|
||||||
- 25% improvement in order cycle time
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Return on Investment Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Cost Factors
|
|
||||||
**Capital Expenditures**:
|
|
||||||
- Equipment purchase and installation
|
|
||||||
- Facility modifications and infrastructure
|
|
||||||
- Software licenses and customization
|
|
||||||
- Training and change management
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Operational Savings**:
|
|
||||||
- Labor cost reductions
|
|
||||||
- Improved space utilization
|
|
||||||
- Reduced inventory carrying costs
|
|
||||||
- Lower error and damage rates
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### ROI Calculation Framework
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
Annual Savings = Labor Savings + Space Savings + Accuracy Improvements + Productivity Gains
|
|
||||||
ROI = (Annual Savings - Annual Operating Costs) / Total Capital Investment
|
|
||||||
Payback Period = Total Capital Investment / Annual Net Savings
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Financial Justification
|
|
||||||
- **Labor Savings**: $30-50k per replaced FTE annually
|
|
||||||
- **Space Savings**: 40-60% floor space reduction potential
|
|
||||||
- **Accuracy Benefits**: Reduced returns and customer service costs
|
|
||||||
- **Productivity Gains**: 2-5x throughput improvement
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Future Trends and Technologies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Emerging Technologies
|
|
||||||
- **Machine Learning**: Predictive analytics and optimization
|
|
||||||
- **Computer Vision**: Advanced item recognition and sorting
|
|
||||||
- **Collaborative Robots**: Safe human-robot interaction
|
|
||||||
- **Digital Twins**: Virtual warehouse simulation and optimization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Industry 4.0 Integration
|
|
||||||
- **IoT Sensors**: Real-time equipment and environment monitoring
|
|
||||||
- **Cloud Computing**: Scalable data processing and analytics
|
|
||||||
- **Edge Computing**: Local processing for real-time decisions
|
|
||||||
- **5G Connectivity**: High-speed, low-latency communications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Sustainability Considerations
|
|
||||||
- **Energy Efficiency**: Reduce power consumption per transaction
|
|
||||||
- **Carbon Footprint**: Optimize transportation and packaging
|
|
||||||
- **Circular Economy**: Support reverse logistics and recycling
|
|
||||||
- **Green Building**: LEED certification and sustainable design
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Best Practices for Implementation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Success Factors
|
|
||||||
1. **Clear Business Case**: Quantified benefits and ROI
|
|
||||||
2. **Executive Sponsorship**: Leadership support and resources
|
|
||||||
3. **Cross-functional Team**: Operations, IT, and finance alignment
|
|
||||||
4. **Phased Approach**: Gradual implementation and learning
|
|
||||||
5. **Change Management**: Comprehensive training and communication
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Common Pitfalls
|
|
||||||
- **Underestimating Integration Complexity**: System interfaces and data flows
|
|
||||||
- **Insufficient Training**: Inadequate workforce preparation
|
|
||||||
- **Poor Maintenance Planning**: Lack of preventive maintenance programs
|
|
||||||
- **Inflexible Design**: Systems that cannot adapt to changes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Risk Mitigation Strategies
|
|
||||||
- **Pilot Testing**: Validate concepts before full deployment
|
|
||||||
- **Vendor Partnerships**: Strong relationships with technology providers
|
|
||||||
- **Backup Systems**: Manual procedures for system failures
|
|
||||||
- **Performance Monitoring**: Continuous system health assessment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Performance Indicators
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Operational Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Throughput**: Orders/items processed per hour
|
|
||||||
- **Accuracy**: Error rates and customer satisfaction
|
|
||||||
- **Utilization**: Equipment and system efficiency
|
|
||||||
- **Cycle Time**: Order-to-shipment duration
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Financial Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Labor Productivity**: Output per labor hour
|
|
||||||
- **Operating Cost**: Cost per transaction/item
|
|
||||||
- **Return on Investment**: Financial performance
|
|
||||||
- **Total Cost of Ownership**: Lifecycle cost analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Maintenance Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Uptime**: System availability percentage
|
|
||||||
- **Mean Time Between Failures**: Reliability measure
|
|
||||||
- **Mean Time to Repair**: Maintenance efficiency
|
|
||||||
- **Preventive Maintenance Compliance**: Scheduled maintenance completion
|
|
||||||
@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Warehouse Layout Optimization Guide
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Fundamental Principles of Efficient Warehouse Design
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### 1. Flow-Based Layout Design
|
|
||||||
- **Linear Flow**: Design straight-line paths from receiving to shipping
|
|
||||||
- **Minimize Backtracking**: Arrange zones to prevent crisscrossing traffic
|
|
||||||
- **Zone Optimization**: Group similar functions together (picking, packing, shipping)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### 2. ABC Analysis for Storage Placement
|
|
||||||
- **A-Items (20% of inventory, 80% of picks)**: Place closest to picking stations
|
|
||||||
- **B-Items (30% of inventory, 15% of picks)**: Medium distance placement
|
|
||||||
- **C-Items (50% of inventory, 5% of picks)**: Furthest from active zones
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### 3. Vertical Space Utilization
|
|
||||||
- **Cube Rule**: Utilize full height capacity with proper racking systems
|
|
||||||
- **Slotting Optimization**: Match product size to storage slot dimensions
|
|
||||||
- **Accessibility Balance**: Heavy items at ergonomic heights (24-48 inches)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Space Utilization Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Cube Utilization**: Target 85-90% for optimal efficiency
|
|
||||||
- **Floor Space Utilization**: Achieve 60-70% storage area to total area ratio
|
|
||||||
- **Picking Density**: Optimize picks per square foot per hour
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Operational Efficiency Metrics
|
|
||||||
- **Pick Path Optimization**: Reduce travel time by 30-40%
|
|
||||||
- **Order Cycle Time**: From order receipt to shipping dock
|
|
||||||
- **Dock Door Utilization**: Maximize throughput per door
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Modern Warehouse Technologies
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Automation Integration
|
|
||||||
- **Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS)**
|
|
||||||
- **Conveyor Systems**: Reduce manual material handling
|
|
||||||
- **Pick-to-Light Systems**: Improve accuracy and speed
|
|
||||||
- **Voice-Directed Picking**: Hands-free operation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Warehouse Management Systems (WMS)
|
|
||||||
- **Real-time Inventory Tracking**
|
|
||||||
- **Dynamic Slotting Algorithms**
|
|
||||||
- **Wave Planning and Optimization**
|
|
||||||
- **Labor Management Integration**
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Case Study: Automotive Parts Manufacturing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A mid-size automotive parts manufacturer implemented layout optimization:
|
|
||||||
- **Results**: 35% reduction in picking time
|
|
||||||
- **Space**: 20% increase in storage capacity
|
|
||||||
- **Accuracy**: 99.8% picking accuracy achieved
|
|
||||||
- **ROI**: 18-month payback period
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Implementation Recommendations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. **Conduct Activity Analysis**: Map current material flow patterns
|
|
||||||
2. **Implement Zone Picking**: Reduce travel time and improve productivity
|
|
||||||
3. **Cross-Docking Opportunities**: Direct supplier-to-customer flow
|
|
||||||
4. **Continuous Improvement**: Regular layout reviews and adjustments
|
|
||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user